Regulatory insights into nanomedicine and gene vaccine innovation: Safety assessment, challenges, and regulatory perspectives
- PMID: 38604468
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.04.010
Regulatory insights into nanomedicine and gene vaccine innovation: Safety assessment, challenges, and regulatory perspectives
Abstract
This analysis explores the principal regulatory concerns linked to nanomedicines and gene vaccines, including the complexities involved and the perspectives on how to navigate them. In the realm of nanomedicines, ensuring the safety of nanomaterials is paramount due to their unique characteristics and potential interactions with biological systems. Regulatory bodies are actively formulating guidelines and standards to assess the safety and risks associated with nanomedicine products, emphasizing the need for standardized characterization techniques to accurately gauge their safety and effectiveness. Regarding gene vaccines, regulatory frameworks must be tailored to address the distinct challenges posed by genetic interventions, necessitating special considerations in safety and efficacy evaluations, particularly concerning vector design, target specificity, and long-term patient monitoring. Ethical concerns such as patient autonomy, informed consent, and privacy also demand careful attention, alongside the intricate matter of intellectual property rights, which must be balanced against the imperative of ensuring widespread access to these life-saving treatments. Collaborative efforts among regulatory bodies, researchers, patent offices, and the private sector are essential to tackle these challenges effectively, with international cooperation being especially crucial given the global scope of nanomedicine and genetic vaccine development. Striking the right balance between safeguarding intellectual properties and promoting public health is vital for fostering innovation and ensuring equitable access to these ground-breaking technologies, underscoring the significance of addressing these regulatory hurdles to fully harness the potential benefits of nanomedicine and gene vaccines for enhancing healthcare outcomes on a global scale. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Several biomaterials are being proposed for the development of nanovaccines, from polymeric micelles, PLGA-/PEI-/PLL-nanoparticles, solid lipid nananoparticles, cationic lipoplexes, liposomes, hybrid materials, dendrimers, carbon nanotubes, hydrogels, to quantum dots. Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have gained tremendous attention since the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of Pfizer and Moderna's COVID-19 vaccines, raising public awareness to the regulatory challenges associated with nanomedicines and genetic vaccines. This review provides insights into the current perspectives and potential strategies for addressing these issues, including clinical trials. By navigating these regulatory landscapes effectively, we can unlock the full potential of nanomedicine and genetic vaccines using a range of promising biomaterials towards improving healthcare outcomes worldwide.
Keywords: Ethical considerations; Gene vaccines; Intellectual property rights; Nanomedicines; Regulatory issues; Safety assessment.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
The use of nanomedicines in the healthcare systems: a policy brief.Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2025 Jun;51(6):523-533. doi: 10.1080/03639045.2025.2489594. Epub 2025 Apr 18. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2025. PMID: 40186592 Review.
-
Comprehensive insights into mechanism of nanotoxicity, assessment methods and regulatory challenges of nanomedicines.Discov Nano. 2024 Oct 4;19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s11671-024-04118-1. Discov Nano. 2024. PMID: 39365367 Free PMC article. Review.
-
COVID-19 Vaccination: Guidance for Ethical, Informed Consent in a National Context.Issues Law Med. 2021 Fall;36(2):127-162. Issues Law Med. 2021. PMID: 36629774
-
Safety and Toxicological Considerations of Nanomedicines: The Future Directions.Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2017;12(2):73-82. doi: 10.2174/1574884712666170509161252. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 28486906 Review.
Cited by
-
Recent Advancements in Nanopharmaceuticals for Novel Drug Delivery Systems.Pharm Nanotechnol. 2025;13(2):271-286. doi: 10.2174/0122117385324246240826042254. Pharm Nanotechnol. 2025. PMID: 39323341 Review.
-
Multi-epitope ligand-conjugated nanoparticles for tumor neoantigen targeting: advancing molecular precision in cancer immunotherapy.Med Oncol. 2025 Aug 11;42(9):424. doi: 10.1007/s12032-025-02986-w. Med Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40788329 Review.
-
Functionally Designed Nanovaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and Its Variants.Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jul 12;12(7):764. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12070764. Vaccines (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39066402 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nanoparticle-based detection of foodborne pathogens: Addressing matrix challenges, advances, and future perspectives in food safety.Food Chem X. 2025 Jun 25;29:102696. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102696. eCollection 2025 Jul. Food Chem X. 2025. PMID: 40672876 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neoantigen mRNA vaccines and A2A receptor antagonism: A strategy to enhance T cell immunity.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2458936. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2458936. Epub 2025 Jan 30. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025. PMID: 39882781 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials