How inclusive were UK-based randomised controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines? A systematic review investigating enrolment of Black adults and adult ethnic minorities
- PMID: 38605411
- PMCID: PMC11010339
- DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08054-4
How inclusive were UK-based randomised controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines? A systematic review investigating enrolment of Black adults and adult ethnic minorities
Abstract
Objectives: To establish if Black adults and adult ethnic minorities, defined as any group except White British, were represented in UK-based COVID-19 vaccination randomised controlled trials (RCTs) when compared to corresponding UK population proportions, based on 2011 census data.
Design: Systematic review of COVID-19 Randomised Controlled Vaccine Trials SETTING: United Kingdom PARTICIPANTS: Randomised Controlled Trials of COVID-19 vaccines conducted in the UK were systematically reviewed following PRISMA guidelines. MeSH terms included "Covid-19 vaccine", "Ad26COVS1", and "BNT162 Vaccine" with keywords such as [covishield OR coronavac OR Vaxzevria OR NVX-CoV2373] also used. Studies that provided (A) participant demographics and (B) full eligibility criteria were included. The following key data was extracted for analysis: number of participants analysed, number of Black adults and number of adult minority ethnicity participants.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome is the mean percentage of Black adults randomised to COVID-19 vaccine trials deemed eligible within this review. The secondary outcome is the mean percentage of adult ethnic minorities randomised.
Results: The final review included 7 papers and a total of 87 sets of data collated from trial sites across the UK. The standard mean percentage of Black adults included in the trials (0.59%, 95% CI: 0.13% - 1.05%) was significantly lower compared to the recorded Black adult population (2.67%) indicating that they were under-served in UK based COVID-19 vaccine RCTs (p < 0.001). Adult ethnic minority presence (8.94%, 95% CI: 2.07% - 15.80%) was also lower than census data (16.30%), indicating they were also under-served (p = 0.039).
Conclusion: The findings show that COVID-19 vaccine trials failed to adequately randomise proportionate numbers of Black adults and adult minority ethnicities. More inclusive practices must be developed and implemented in the recruitment of underserved groups to understand the true impact of COVID-19.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Ethnic minority representation in UK COVID-19 trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Med. 2023 Mar 29;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02809-7. BMC Med. 2023. PMID: 36978166 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2. Trials. 2021. PMID: 34488843 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8348. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34003274 Free PMC article.
-
Facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination uptake among ethnic minorities: A qualitative study in primary care.PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0270504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270504. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35802738 Free PMC article.
-
Ethnic/racial minorities' and migrants' access to COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators.J Migr Health. 2022;5:100086. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2022.100086. Epub 2022 Feb 18. J Migr Health. 2022. PMID: 35194589 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Recommendations for developing accessible patient information leaflets for clinical trials to address English language literacy as a barrier to research participation.Trials. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08471-5. Trials. 2024. PMID: 39334243 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding Inclusion and Participation of People From Black African Diaspora Communities in Health and Care Research: A Realist Review.Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70298. doi: 10.1111/hex.70298. Health Expect. 2025. PMID: 40405456 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Health Organisation. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 26]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/
-
- Public Health England. Disparities in the risk and outcomes of COVID-19 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-review-of-disparitie...
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Research. NIHR research ethnicity data provides insight on participation in COVID-19 studies [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 May 4]. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/nihr-research-ethnicity-data-provides-insigh...
-
- Race Disparity Unit UG. Writing about ethnicity [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/style-guide/writing-a...
-
- Chaturvedi N, McKeigue PM, Marmot MG. Resting and ambulatory blood pressure differences in Afro-Caribbeans and Europeans. Hypertension [Internet]. 1993 Jul [cited 2022 Apr 20];22(1):90–6. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.hyp.22.1.90 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical