Contributing to 'a sense of purpose' - Evaluating consumer recovery progress after attending a therapeutic-recreation intervention programme: A quantitative analysis
- PMID: 38605480
- PMCID: PMC11323423
- DOI: 10.1177/00207640241242024
Contributing to 'a sense of purpose' - Evaluating consumer recovery progress after attending a therapeutic-recreation intervention programme: A quantitative analysis
Abstract
Introduction: The recommended objective for mental health plans and policies is the adoption of recovery approaches to mental healthcare. Mental health recovery is no longer defined by symptom resolution but as a journey towards a meaningful life from the consumer's own perspective. Recovery approaches focus on consumers' strengths, feelings of well-being and the achievement of personal goals. Designing recovery-oriented interventions is crucial for supporting people in their personal recovery journey.
Aim: This study sought to evaluate how attending a recovery-oriented intervention impacts the recovery of attending people living with serious mental illness.
Methods: A quasi-experimental approach was utilised to examine changes in self-reported recovery progress in a purposive sample of consumers living with enduring mental illness (N = 105). Recovery progress was evaluated via the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS). Data were collected at entry and exit to a therapeutic recreation programme grounded in principles of recovery-oriented care and social contact theory. Pre-post scores were analysed via a repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance (RM-MANOVA) per the four RAS-DS recovery domains.
Results: After attending the therapeutic recreation programme, consumer recovery scores significantly increased in the functional, personal, and social recovery RAS-DS domains as measured by 'Doing Things I Value', 'Looking Forward', and 'Connecting and Belonging' (respectively). No changes were observed to consumers' clinical recovery progress, as assessed via the recovery domain 'Mastering my Illness'.
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that therapeutic recreation camps can provide a recovery-based approach to mental healthcare, with positive effects on the three areas of: a purposeful life; connection and belonging; and optimism and hope. Recovery Camp has been previously identified by the Productivity Commission as having potential person-centred recovery benefits for mental health consumers. The results of this study now establish these benefits as evidence based and can be used to guide mental health practice and policy for the implementation of therapeutic recreation camps for mental health recovery.
Keywords: Mental health; domains of recovery; mental illness; recovery.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Recovery Camp is a research and social impact programme that has been supported by the University of Wollongong to explore its potential as a social enterprise. Authors C. Patterson and L. Moxham are directors of Recovery Camp Pty. Ltd.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Community-Based Recreation Therapy and Mental Health Recovery: A Mixed-Media Participatory Action Research Study.Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(2):161-170. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0016. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019. PMID: 31178451
-
Connection and recovery in the COVID-19 age: An analysis of changes in goal-setting throughout the pandemic by consumers living with enduring mental illness.Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Feb;33(1):166-174. doi: 10.1111/inm.13232. Epub 2023 Sep 24. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024. PMID: 37743556
-
Recovery Camp: Assisting consumers toward enhanced self-determination.Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Jun;26(3):301-308. doi: 10.1111/inm.12227. Epub 2016 May 27. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017. PMID: 27230567
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Sep;18(9):1820-1869. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00263. JBI Evid Synth. 2020. PMID: 32813402
Cited by
-
Conceptualisation of Mental Health Recovery by Health Professionals and Students in Southeast Asia: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Aggregation.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jun;32(3):783-799. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13158. Epub 2025 Feb 17. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2025. PMID: 39960097 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ariss J. J., Gerlach A., Baker J. B., Barry K., Cooper L., de Vries T. L., Halligan K., Lacroix M. (2019). Community-based recreation therapy and mental health recovery: A mixed-media participatory action research study. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 13(2), 161–170. 10.1353/cpr.2019.0016 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2022). National study of mental Health and wellbeing. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/mental-health/national-study-me...
-
- Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. (2013). A national framework for recovery-oriented mental health services: Guide for practitioners and providers. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved 30 January, 2024, from https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/04/a-nation...
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2015). Measuring recovery in Australian specialised mental health services: A status report. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved 30 January, 2024, from https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/4c6c763c-97ca-49db-b817-b00b1e443a54/me...
-
- Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. David McKay Co Inc.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical