Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 28:15:1359626.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359626. eCollection 2024.

The impact of boarding school on student development in primary and secondary schools: a meta-analysis

Zhiyong Zhong  1 , Yang Feng  1 , Yongqi Xu  1
Affiliations

The impact of boarding school on student development in primary and secondary schools: a meta-analysis

Zhiyong Zhong et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

As a long-established model of schooling, the boarding system is commonly practiced in countries around the world. Numerous scholars have conducted a great deal of research on the relationship between the boarding school and student development, but the results of the research are quite divergent. In order to clarify the real effects of boarding school on students' development, this study used meta-analysis to quantify 49 (91 effect sizes) experimental or quasi-experimental studies on related topics at home and abroad. The results find that: (1) Overall, boarding school has no significant predictive effect on student development, with a combined effect size of 0.002 (p > 0.05); (2) Specifically, boarding school has a significant positive predictive effect on students' cognitive development (g = 0.248, p < 0.001), a significant negative predictive effect on students' affective and attitudinal development (g = -0.159, p < 0.05), and no significant predictive effect on students' behavioral development (g = -0.115, p > 0.05) and physical development (g = -0.038, p > 0.05); (3) The relationship between the two is moderated by the school stage and the type of boarding school, but not by the instruments; (4) Compared with primary school students, senior high school students and urban boarding students, the negative predictive effect of boarding system on junior middle school students and rural boarding students is more significant. In addition, there are some limitations in the study, such as the limited number of moderator variables included, the results of the study are easily affected by the quality of the included literature, and the dimensionality of the core variable "student development" is not comprehensive enough. In the future, further validation should be conducted through in-depth longitudinal or experimental studies.

Keywords: boarding school; effect size; meta-analysis; primary and secondary school students; student development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the inclusion protocol.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta-analytic framework diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson L. W. (2009). Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Jiang, X. P, Luo, J. J, & Zhang, Q. M.). Bei jing: Wai yu jiao xue yu yan jiu chu ban she.
    1. Behaghel L., Chaisemartin C., Gurgand M. (2017). Ready for boarding? The effects of a boarding school for disadvantaged students. Am. Econ. J-Appl Econ. 9, 140–164. doi: 10.1257/app.20150090 - DOI
    1. Ben-David A., Erez-Darvish T. (1997). The effect of the family on the emotional life of Ethiopian immigrant adolescents in boarding schools in Israel. Resid. Treat. Child. Yo. 15, 39–50. doi: 10.1300/j007v15n02_04 - DOI
    1. Blau R., Blau P. (2021). Identity status, separation, and parent-adolescent relationships among boarding and day school students. Resid. Treat. Child. Yo. 38, 178–197. doi: 10.1080/0886571X.2019.1692757 - DOI
    1. Bosmans G., Kerns K. A. (2015). Attachment in middle childhood: Progress and prospects. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 2015, 1–14. doi: 10.1002/cad.20100, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

Publication types