Syntax Error: Variations in the Verbiage of Prescription Labels for Pediatric Liquid Medications
- PMID: 38606237
- PMCID: PMC11008777
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56039
Syntax Error: Variations in the Verbiage of Prescription Labels for Pediatric Liquid Medications
Abstract
Background Pharmacists can modify prescriptions from prescribers for clarity and patient understanding, provided the confines of the original order are met, yet the verbiage used by pharmacists is not standardized. Prescription directions for children, especially children eight years old and younger, should be written with the verb "give" instead of "take" as their parents or caregivers are expected to administer them. Errors in prescribing, dispensing, and administering medication comprise a significant portion of preventable medical errors in children. To intervene and assist pharmacies, we must first identify and characterize the problem. This study aimed to determine if there is a relationship between prescribers and pharmacists using the verb "give" or "take" when prescribing and printing prescription labels for pediatric liquid medications. In addition, it aimed to determine if there is a relationship between chain pharmacies and independent pharmacies using the verb "give" or "take" when printing labels for pediatric liquid medications. Methodology The participants in this study were caregivers of children eight years old and younger who had been prescribed a new liquid medication. We recruited prescribers in North Louisiana to serve as a referral base for the study. Caregivers were referred to the study by prescribers. A rubric was created to investigate the text of prescription labels. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the relationship between verb choice and prescribers and pharmacists, as well as the relationship between verb choice and chain pharmacies and independent pharmacies. Results A total of 11 (26.83%) prescriber texts used the verb "give," while 12 (29.27%) prescriber texts used the verb "take." Overall, 18 (43.90%) prescriber texts did not use a verb at all. Of these 18 prescriber texts that did not include a verb, 14 prescription labels used the verb "give," and four used the verb "take." In total, 10 (23.81%) chain pharmacy prescription labels used the verb "give," and 10 (23.81%) chain pharmacy prescription labels used the verb "take." The two-tailed p-value of Fisher's exact test comparing verb choice between prescribers and pharmacists equaled 0.0001. A total of 19 (46.34%) independent pharmacy prescription labels used the verb "give," and two (4.88%) independent pharmacy prescription labels used the verb "take." The two-tailed p-value of Fisher's exact test comparing verb choice between chain pharmacies and independent pharmacies equaled 0.0063. Conclusions The relationship between prescriber texts and pharmacist prescription labels shows a relationship between their verb choice (p = 0.0001). The relationship between chain pharmacy and independent pharmacy prescription labels shows a relationship between their verb choice (p = 0.0063). This study has illuminated how medication orders begin before they are modified, if necessary, for the patient's clarity and understanding. This study can be used to instruct prescribers on writing more accurate prescription instructions to prevent medical errors, and it can help pharmacists recognize potential dangers and prevent them through editing.
Keywords: knowledge among pharmacists; liquid medication; medication injury; pediatrics; prescription writing.
Copyright © 2024, Bordelon et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
What do Australian consumers, pharmacists and prescribers think about documenting indications on prescriptions and dispensed medicines labels?: A qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2704-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 29141618 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of community chain pharmacists' interventions on electronic prescriptions.J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Jan-Feb;49(1):59-64. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08013. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009. PMID: 19196598
-
Examination of why some community pharmacists do not provide 72-hour emergency prescription drugs to Medicaid patients when prior authorization is not available.J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Sep;19(7):523-33. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.7.523. J Manag Care Pharm. 2013. PMID: 23964613 Free PMC article.
-
A Preliminary Scoping Review of the Impact of e-Prescribing on Pharmacists in Community Pharmacies.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 26;12(13):1280. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131280. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38998815 Free PMC article.
-
Including the Reason for Use on Prescriptions Sent to Pharmacists: Scoping Review.JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Nov 25;8(4):e22325. doi: 10.2196/22325. JMIR Hum Factors. 2021. PMID: 34842545 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Liquid drug dosage measurement errors with different dosing devices. Joshi P, Bavdekar SB. Indian J Pediatr. 2019;86:382–385. - PubMed
-
- Committee on Drugs. Metric units and the preferred dosing of orally administered liquid medications. Pediatrics. 2015;135:784–787.
-
- National Council for Prescription Drug Programs. Scottsdale, AZ: NCPDP. Scottsdale, AZ: National Council for Prescription Drug Programs; 2021. NCPDP Recommendations for Standardizing Dosing in Metric Units (mL) on Prescription Container Labels of Oral Liquid Medications.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous