Limb Salvage and Pelvic Reconstruction With Endoprosthesis After Pelvic Tumor Resection: A Narrative Review
- PMID: 38606257
- PMCID: PMC11007484
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56043
Limb Salvage and Pelvic Reconstruction With Endoprosthesis After Pelvic Tumor Resection: A Narrative Review
Abstract
Periacetabular defects following tumor resection present formidable challenges in reconstruction and continue to pose clinical difficulties. Historically, treatment approaches leaned towards hindquarter amputation; however, due to associated morbidities and functional limitations, limb-sparing procedures gained prominence in the 1980s. Nevertheless, the intricacies of pelvic anatomy and the imperative of achieving wide surgical margins while preserving essential structures make pelvic tumor resection and subsequent reconstruction inherently complex. Various reconstruction modalities have been explored, including non-vascularized fibular grafts and prosthetic implants. Among these options, the LUMiC® endoprosthesis stands out as a promising solution for pelvic reconstruction post-tumor resection. Characterized by a modular design featuring a hydroxyapatite-coated stem and acetabular cup, this device has shown favorable implant survival rates in studies, despite encountering complications primarily associated with soft tissue failure, dislocation, and infection. Notably, the incidence of complications varies across studies. The Henderson classification system delineates these complications, encompassing soft tissue issues, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fractures, infections, and tumor recurrence. Despite the encouraging functional outcomes associated with the LUMiC® endoprosthesis, it is not immune to limitations. Concerns persist regarding complications such as dislocation and infection, underscoring the imperative for further research to evaluate the long-term durability and reliability of this reconstructive approach. Moreover, advancements in surgical techniques, perioperative management, and the advent of navigation-assisted procedures hold promise for enhancing outcomes and mitigating complication rates in pelvic reconstruction surgeries.
Keywords: endoprosthetic reconstruction; lumic; pelvic reconstruction; periacetabular tumors; sarcoma.
Copyright © 2024, Roustemis et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures

Similar articles
-
LUMiC® Endoprosthetic Reconstruction After Periacetabular Tumor Resection: Short-term Results.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):686-695. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4805-4. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 27020434 Free PMC article.
-
Reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection with Lumic® endoprosthesis: What are the midterm results?J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;123(2):532-543. doi: 10.1002/jso.26318. Epub 2020 Nov 25. J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33238055
-
Is High-dose Radiation Therapy Associated With Early Revision Due to Aseptic Loosening in Patients With a Sarcoma of the Lower Extremities Reconstructed With a Cemented Endoprosthesis?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Mar 1;481(3):475-487. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002360. Epub 2022 Aug 17. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 35977001 Free PMC article.
-
Periacetabular reconstruction following limb-salvage surgery for pelvic sarcomas.J Bone Oncol. 2021 Oct 18;31:100396. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100396. eCollection 2021 Dec. J Bone Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34786331 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Causes and Frequencies of Reoperations After Endoprosthetic Reconstructions for Extremity Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Apr;477(4):894-902. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000630. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 30801278 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Modular Hemipelvic Prosthesis Preserves Normal Biomechanics and Showed Good Compatibility: A Finite Element Analysis.J Funct Biomater. 2024 Sep 21;15(9):276. doi: 10.3390/jfb15090276. J Funct Biomater. 2024. PMID: 39330251 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pelvic bone sarcomas, prognostic factors, and treatment: a narrative review of the literature. Laitinen MK, Parry MC, Morris GV, Jeys LM. Scand J Surg. 2023;112:206–215. - PubMed
-
- Oncologic outcome and quality of life after hindquarter amputation for sarcoma: is it worth it? van Houdt WJ, Griffin AM, Wunder JS, Ferguson PC. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:378–386. - PubMed
-
- Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. Enneking WF, Dunham WK. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/701308/ J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:731–746. - PubMed
-
- Innovative methods of reconstruction after pelvic tumor resection. Perry KI, Abdel MP, Lewallen DG, Rose PS, Sim FH. Curr Surg Rep. 2014;2:41.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources