Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 12;28(5):249.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05629-y.

Duration of orthodontic treatment with clear aligners versus fixed appliances in crowding cases: a systematic review

Ahmad Marwan Alhamwi  1 , Ahmad Sharafeddin Burhan  2 , Mohammad Ibrahim Idris  2 , Fehmieh Rafik Nawaya  3
Affiliations

Duration of orthodontic treatment with clear aligners versus fixed appliances in crowding cases: a systematic review

Ahmad Marwan Alhamwi et al. Clin Oral Investig. .

Abstract

Objective: To critically appraise and assess the currently observed evidence about the difference in orthodontic treatment duration between clear aligners and fixed appliances in crowding cases.

Materials and methods: An electronic search without limitations was conducted from inception to June 2023 covering nine databases: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Trip, CINAHL via EBSCO, EMBASE via OVID and ProQuest. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and matched non-randomized studies were included in this systematic review. Risk of Bias was assessed via Cochrane's tool (RoB 2) for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was employed to evaluate the overall quality of evidence.

Results: Out of the 3537 articles initially identified, ten eligible studies were included in this systematic review; six were RCTs. Only one study offered extraction-based treatment, while the other nine adopted non-extraction treatments. According to the GRADE, there is low evidence that treatment duration in mild to moderate crowding cases with clear aligners is similar to that in fixed orthodontic appliances. Meta-analysis was not administered due to high inconsistency.

Conclusions: Based on currently available information, there was no significant difference in the treatment duration between the CA and FA groups in mild to moderate crowding cases. Further well-performed RCTs, especially in severe cases, are required.

Clinical relevance: Time efficiency is an essential outcome measure for clinical orthodontic practice. While the type of appliance used is a critical determinant of treatment duration, orthodontists should be aware of other factors that can significantly impact treatment time, such as patient and treatment-related factors.

Keywords: Orthodontics. Orthodontic appliances. Clear aligners. Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr., Moray LJ (1998) Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 13(2):97–106 - PubMed
    1. Graber LW et al (2022) Orthodontics-e-book: current principles and techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences
    1. Zhang M, McGrath C, Hagg U (2006) The impact of malocclusion and its treatment on quality of life: a literature review. Int J Paediatr Dent 16(6):381–387 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerosuo H et al (1995) The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod 17(6):505–512 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sa-Pinto AC et al (2018) Association between malocclusion and dental caries in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 19(2):73–82 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources