Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Jun;66(6):907-917.
doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03345-8. Epub 2024 Apr 12.

Prognostic value of radiological T category using conventional MRI in patients with oral tongue cancer: comparison with pathological T category

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prognostic value of radiological T category using conventional MRI in patients with oral tongue cancer: comparison with pathological T category

Masaya Kawaguchi et al. Neuroradiology. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the radiological tumor (T)-category using multiparametric MRI with the pathological T category in patients with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) and to examine which is a better predictor of prognosis.

Methods: This retrospective study included 110 consecutive patients with surgically resected primary OTSCC who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI. T categories determined by maximum diameter and depth of invasion were retrospectively assessed based on the pathological specimen and multiparametric MRI. The MRI assessment included the axial and coronal T1-weighted image (T1WI), axial T2-weighted image (T2WI), coronal fat-suppressed T2WI, and axial and coronal fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1WI (CET1WI). Axial and coronal CET1WI measurements were divided into two groups: measurements excluding peritumoral enhancement (MEP) and measurements including peritumoral enhancement. The prognostic values for recurrence and disease-specific survival after radiological and pathological T categorization of cases into T1/T2 and T3/T4 groups were compared.

Results: The T category of MEP on coronal CET1WI was the most relevant prognostic factor for recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.30, p = 0.001] and the HR was higher than the HR for pathological assessment (HR = 2.26, p = 0.026). The T category determined by MEP on coronal CET1WI was also the most relevant prognostic factor for disease-specific survival (HR = 3.12, p = 0.03), and the HR was higher than the HR for pathological assessment (HR = 2.02, p = 0.20).

Conclusion: The T category determined by MEP on the coronal CET1WI was the best prognostic factor among all radiological and pathological T category measurements.

Keywords: MRI; Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma; Peritumoral enhancement; Prognosis; Tumor staging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Axial fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image shows the measurement of the maximum diameter determined by MEP (solid line) and MIP (dotted line). b Coronal fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image shows the measurement of the depth of invasion determined by MEP (solid line) and MIP (dotted line). Right submandibular nodal metastasis is shown (arrow). c Histological specimen (H&E stain; scale bar, 5 mm) shows tongue cancer in the central areas (star) and inflammation, vascular enlargement, or edema in the peripheral areas (asterisk)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Prognostic impact in patients with OTSCC. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for recurrence-free survival (T1/T2 vs. T3/T4). The T categories are measured by a pathology, b coronal CET1WI-MEP, and c coronal CET1WI-MIP
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Prognostic impact in patients with OTSCC. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for disease-specific survival (T1/T2 vs. T3/T4). The T categories are measured by a pathology, b coronal CET1WI-MEP, and c coronal CET1WI-MIP

Similar articles

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS. Jemal A (2023) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tang W, Wang Y, Yuan Y, Tao X. Assessment of tumor depth in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma with multiparametric MRI: correlation with pathology. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(1):254–261. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08148-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Badwelan M, Muaddi H, Ahmed A, Lee KT, Tran SD. Oral squamous cell carcinoma and concomitant primary tumors, what do we know? A Review of the Literature. Curr Oncol. 2023;30(4):3721–3734. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30040283. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zittel S, Moratin J, Horn D, Metzger K, Ristow O, Engel M, Mrosek J, Freier K, Hoffmann J, Freudlsperger C. Clinical outcome and prognostic factors in recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma after primary surgical treatment: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Invest. 2022;26(2):2055–2064. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04186-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Takamura M, Kobayashi T, Nikkuni Y, Katsura K, Yamazaki M, Maruyama S, Tanuma JI, Hayashi T. A comparative study between CT, MRI, and intraoral US for the evaluation of the depth of invasion in early stage (T1/T2) tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Radiol. 2022;38(1):114–125. doi: 10.1007/s11282-021-00533-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms