Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):458.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10888-2.

Outpatient geriatric health care in the German federal state of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania: a population-based spatial analysis of claims data

Nils Pfeuffer #  1 , Franziska Radicke #  2 , Maren Leiz  3 , Kilson Moon  2 , Wolfgang Hoffmann  2 , Neeltje van den Berg  2
Affiliations

Outpatient geriatric health care in the German federal state of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania: a population-based spatial analysis of claims data

Nils Pfeuffer et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Due to unidentified geriatric needs, elderly patients have a higher risk for developing chronic conditions and acute medical complications. Early geriatric screenings and assessments help to identify geriatric needs. Holistic and coordinated therapeutic approaches addressing those needs maintain the independence of elderly patients and avoid adverse effects. General practitioners are important for the timely identification of geriatric needs. The aims of this study are to examine the spatial distribution of the utilization of outpatient geriatric services in the very rural Federal State of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania in the Northeast of Germany and to identify regional disparities.

Methods: Geographical analysis and cartographic visualization of the spatial distribution of outpatient geriatric services of patients who are eligible to receive basic geriatric care (BGC) or specialized geriatric care (SGC) were carried out. Claims data of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania were analysed on the level of postcode areas for the quarter periods between 01/2014 and 04/2017. A Moran's I analysis was carried out to identify clusters of utilization rates.

Results: Of all patients who were eligible for BGC in 2017, 58.3% (n = 129,283/221,654) received at least one BCG service. 77.2% (n = 73,442/95,171) of the patients who were eligible for SGC, received any geriatric service (BGC or SGC). 0.4% (n = 414/95,171) of the patients eligible for SGC, received SGC services. Among the postcode areas in the study region, the proportion of patients who received a basic geriatric assessment ranged from 3.4 to 86.7%. Several regions with statistically significant Clusters of utilization rates were identified.

Conclusions: The widely varying utilization rates and the local segregation of high and low rates indicate that the provision of outpatient geriatric care may depend to a large extent on local structures (e.g., multiprofessional, integrated networks or innovative projects or initiatives). The great overall variation in the provision of BGC services implicates that the identification of geriatric needs in GPs' practices should be more standardized. In order to reduce regional disparities in the provision of BGC and SGC services, innovative solutions and a promotion of specialized geriatric networks or healthcare providers are necessary.

Keywords: Claims data; Geriatric assessment; Geriatrics; Rural healthcare; Spatial analysis; Utilization of geriatric care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proportion of eligible patients with at least one BGA of all patients eligible to BGC by postcode areas in 2017. Own presentation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of eligible patients with at least one BGT of all patients eligible to BGC by postcode areas in 2017. Own presentation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Local Moran’s I for basic geriatric assessment. Own presentation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Local Moran’s I for basic geriatric treatment. Own presentation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Sander M, Oxlund B, Jespersen A, Krasnik A, Mortensen EL, Westendorp RGJ, et al. The challenges of human population ageing. Age Ageing. 2014;44(2):185–7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu189. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goins RT, Williams KA, Carter MW, Spencer M, Solovieva T. Perceived barriers to health care access among rural older adults: a qualitative study. JRural Health. 2005;21(3):206–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2005.tb00084.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith ML, Dickerson JB, Wendel ML, Ahn S, Pulczinski JC, Drake KN, et al. The Utility of Rural and Underserved designations in Geospatial assessments of Distance traveled to Healthcare Services: Implications for Public Health Research and Practice. J Environ Public Health. 2013;2013:11. doi: 10.1155/2013/960157. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal TC, Fox C. Access to Health Care for the Rural Elderly. JAMA. 2000;284(16):2034–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.16.2034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hämel K, Ewers M, Schaeffer D. Versorgungsgestaltung Angesichts Regionaler Unterschiede. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie Und Geriatrie. 2013;46(4):323–8. doi: 10.1007/s00391-012-0465-5. - DOI - PubMed