Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 12;23(1):69.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02178-4.

Rural-urban inequalities in health care utilization in Bhutan: a decomposition analysis

Jayendra Sharma  1   2 , Milena Pavlova  3 , Wim Groot  3
Affiliations

Rural-urban inequalities in health care utilization in Bhutan: a decomposition analysis

Jayendra Sharma et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background and objective: On the trajectory towards universal health coverage in Bhutan, health equity requires policy attention as significant disparities exist between urban and rural health outcomes. This paper examines health services utilization patterns, inequalities and their socio-economic determinants in rural and urban areas and decomposes the factors behind these differences.

Methods: We used the Bhutan Living Standard Survey 2017 to profile health services utilization patterns and equalities. We employed two different decomposition analyses: decomposition of mean differences in utilization using the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition framework and differences in the income-related distribution in utilization using recentered influence function regressions between rural and urban areas.

Results: Significant differences exist in the type of outpatient services used by the rural and urban population groups, with those living in rural areas having 3.4 times higher odds of using primary health centers compared to outpatient hospital care. We find that the use of primary health care is pro-poor and that outpatient hospital resources is concentrated among the more affluent section of the population, with this observed inequality consistent across settings but more severe in rural areas. The rural-urban gap in utilization is primarily driven by income and residence in the eastern region, while income-related inequality in utilization is influenced, aside from income, by residence in the central region, household size, and marriage and employment status of the household head. We do not find evidence of significant mean differences in overall utilization or inequality in utilization of inpatient health care services.

Conclusions: While the differences in average contacts with health services are insignificant, there are prominent differences in the level of services availed and the associated inequality among rural and urban settings in Bhutan. Besides, while there are obvious overlaps, factors influencing income-related inequality are not necessarily the same as those driving the utilization gaps. Cognizance of these differences may lead to better informed, targeted, and potentially more effective future research and policies for universal health coverage.

Keywords: Bhutan; Decomposition analysis; Health care utilization; Health inequality; Universal health coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Fairlie decomposition of difference in utilization (endowment effects) between urban and rural areas
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Concentration curves for utilization of health services
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . The world health report: health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TA, Taylor S. Commission on social determinants of health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1661–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mooney GH. Equity in health care: confronting the confusion. Elf Health Care. 1983;1(4):179–185. - PubMed
    1. van Doorslaer E and Wagstaff A. Equity in the finance of health care: methods and findings, in van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, and Rutten F. (eds)’ Equity in the Finance and Delivery of Health Care: An International Perspective. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1993.
    1. Gulliford M, Hughes D, Figeroa-Munoz J, Hudson M, Connell P, Morgan M, et al. Access to Health Care. London: King's College London; 2001.

LinkOut - more resources