Photoelastic effects of maxillary protraction on the craniofacial complex
- PMID: 3861097
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90235-0
Photoelastic effects of maxillary protraction on the craniofacial complex
Abstract
The conventional treatment of anterior crossbites has been the application of orthopedic force to the mandible to redirect its growth. However, in the patient with an underdeveloped maxilla, this treatment alone is not sufficient. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to study the orthopedic effects of maxillary protraction appliances in the treatment of anterior crossbites. A three-dimensional anatomic model of a human skull was fabricated with birefringent materials for photoelastic analysis. Three maxillary protraction appliances that utilized different anchorage units were used. The protraction forces placed on these appliances were parallel to the occlusal plane, a downward vector 20 degrees to the occlusal plane, and a combination of these two vectors. The resulting stress patterns were observed. The effects of the forces produced by the three appliances were transmitted to the maxilla and distant craniofacial structures. Both a parallel traction and a 20 degrees downward pull to the occlusal plane caused a constriction of the anterior portion of the maxilla. The parallel traction caused a counterclockwise (opening) rotation of the molar tooth and palatal plane. A 20 degrees downward force to the occlusal plane decreased this effect.
Similar articles
-
Effects of directions of maxillary protraction forces on biomechanical changes in craniofacial complex.Eur J Orthod. 1989 Nov;11(4):382-91. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a036010. Eur J Orthod. 1989. PMID: 2591486
-
Biomechanical effects of maxillary protraction on the craniofacial complex.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987 Apr;91(4):305-11. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90171-5. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987. PMID: 3471073
-
Biomechanical effect of anteriorly directed extraoral forces on the craniofacial complex: a study using the finite element method.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Mar;95(3):200-7. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90050-4. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989. PMID: 2923100
-
A reexamination of various extraoral appliances in light of recent research findings.Angle Orthod. 1999 Feb;69(1):81-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0081:AROVEA>2.3.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1999. PMID: 10022189 Review.
-
Sutures and forces: a review.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Aug;94(2):129-41. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90361-7. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988. PMID: 3041795 Review.
Cited by
-
Displacements prediction from 3D finite element model of maxillary protraction with and without rapid maxillary expansion in a patient with unilateral cleft palate and alveolus.Biomed Eng Online. 2015 Aug 19;14:80. doi: 10.1186/s12938-015-0074-9. Biomed Eng Online. 2015. PMID: 26285822 Free PMC article.
-
Management of the Class III malocclusion treated with maxillary expansion, facemask therapy and corrective orthodontic. A 15-year follow-up.J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):101-9. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720140074. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015. PMID: 25760273 Free PMC article.
-
Early Management of Class III Malocclusion in Mixed Dentition.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):331-334. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1752. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021. PMID: 34413617 Free PMC article.
-
Early post-treatment changes of circumaxillary sutures in young patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion.Angle Orthod. 2011 Jan;81(1):36-41. doi: 10.2319/050910-250.1. Angle Orthod. 2011. PMID: 20936952 Free PMC article.
-
Ball Headed Mini Implant.J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):ZL02-ZL03. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24358.9240. Epub 2017 Jan 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. PMID: 28274084 Free PMC article. No abstract available.