Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 3;25(7):3992.
doi: 10.3390/ijms25073992.

Mobocertinib in Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MOON): An International Real-World Safety and Efficacy Analysis

Affiliations

Mobocertinib in Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MOON): An International Real-World Safety and Efficacy Analysis

Oliver Illini et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

EGFR exon 20 (EGFR Ex20) insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are insensitive to traditional EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Mobocertinib is the only approved TKI specifically designed to target EGFR Ex20. We performed an international, real-world safety and efficacy analysis on patients with EGFR Ex20-positive NSCLC enrolled in a mobocertinib early access program. We explored the mechanisms of resistance by analyzing postprogression biopsies, as well as cross-resistance to amivantamab. Data from 86 patients with a median age of 67 years and a median of two prior lines of treatment were analyzed. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 95% of patients. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported in 38% of patients and included diarrhea (22%) and rash (8%). In 17% of patients, therapy was permanently discontinued, and two patients died due to TRAEs. Women were seven times more likely to discontinue treatment than men. In the overall cohort, the objective response rate to mobocertinib was 34% (95% CI, 24-45). The response rate in treatment-naïve patients was 27% (95% CI, 8-58). The median progression-free and overall survival was 5 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.5) and 12 months (95% CI, 6.8-17.2), respectively. The intracranial response rate was limited (13%), and one-third of disease progression cases involved the brain. Mobocertinib also showed antitumor activity following EGFR Ex20-specific therapy and vice versa. Potential mechanisms of resistance to mobocertinib included amplifications in MET, PIK3CA, and NRAS. Mobocertinib demonstrated meaningful efficacy in a real-world setting but was associated with considerable gastrointestinal and cutaneous toxicity.

Keywords: EGFR exon 20 inhibitors; exon 20 insertion; mobocertinib; non-small cell lung cancer; real-world data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Oliver IIllini received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Roche and received research grants from Amgen outside of the submitted study. Felix Saalfeld received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Thieme. Consulting: Janssen and AstraZeneca. Research: Roche. Travel/accomodation/expenses: Lilly. Petros Christopoulos received research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche, Takeda and received advisory board/lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda. Michaël Duruisseaux reported having membership in an advisory council or committee for Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merus, Amgen, Guardant, and Pfizer; receiving consulting fees from Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gamamabs Pharma, and Pfizer; and receiving research grants from Takeda, NanoString, Lilly, and Blueprint. Anders Vikström received speaker fees, consultations, and honoraria for advisory boards from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, ELI-Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda and research grants from Boehringer-Ingelheim. Nir Peled reported honoraria for advisory and research with AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Foundation Medicine, Gaurdant Health, Merk, MSD, Novartis, Novocure, NovellusDx, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda. Ingel Demedts received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Astra Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daichii, Eli Lilly, J@J, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. Elizabeth Dudnik reported grants from Astra Zeneca and speaker fees and honoraria for advisory boards from Roche, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Takeda, Medison, Merck Serono, Janssen, and Sanofi. Anna Eisert received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Amgen, and Merck. Sayed Hashemi reported research grants and/or honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Lilly, Janssen, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. Urska Janzic, received honoraria for advisory boards from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. Waleed Kian received speaker fees from MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and AstraZeneca. Katja Mohorcic received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Jansen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. Maria Silvoniemi received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from MSD, BMS, Roche, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Novartis, Merck, and Janssen. Sacha Rothschild reported consulting fees (payment to the institution) from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi Aventis, and Takeda; research support from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Merck, and Roche; honoraria for lectures and presentations (payment to the institution) from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Roche Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, abd Takeda; payment for expert testimony (payment to the institution) from AstraZeneca, BMS, and Roche Pharma; and support for travel and accommodations (payment to the institution) from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Roche, and Takeda. Vice President of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Member of the Federal Drug Commission of the Federal Office of Public Health. Christian Schulz received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda. Claas Wesseler received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, MSD, Novartis, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Chugai, and BMS. Alfredo Addeo reported honoraria for consulting or advisory roles from BMS, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Astellas, Amgen, and Novartis and for the speaker bureau from Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca, and Amgen. Karin Armster received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from MSD, AstraZeneca, Roche, Takeda, and Sanofi. Malinda Itchings received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer, MSD, Amgen, Merck, Roche, and BeiGene and received research grants from Pfizer. Marija Ivanovic received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda. Diego Kauffmann-Guerrero received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen, and Janssen. Jussi Koivunen received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Amges, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda and received research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roche. Jonas Kuon received speaker fees from BMS, AZ, and Pfizer and research grants from AZ and BMS. Nick Pavlakis received honoraria for advisory boards from MSD, Merck, BMS, Astra Zeneca, Takeda, Pfizer, Roche, Amgen, and Beigene; speaking honoraria from Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Pierre-Faber, Illumina, and Bayer; and research funding (to the institution) from Bayer, Pfizer, and Roche. Berber Piet received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda and received research grants from Amgen and Treatmeds. Martin Sebastian reported grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer, personal fees and non-financial support from BMS, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from CureVac, personal fees from Biontech, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees and non-financial support from Takeda, personal fees from Sanofi-Aventis, personal fees from Roche, and personal fees from Merck, outside the submitted work. Janna-Lisa Velthaus-Rusik received speaker honoraria from i-med Institute. Received travel costs and congress fees from Lilly and Janssen. Marcel Wiesweg reported honoraria for advisory roles from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda and research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Takeda. Robert Wurm received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. Corinna Albers-Leischner reported no conflicts but funding by DKH (nNGM). Daniela Aust reported honoraria from Roche, Astra Zeneca, MSD, Pfizer, and Novartis. Melanie Janning received speaker’s and/or advisory board honoraria from Roche, Boehringer, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck, and MSD and travel reimbursements from AstraZeneca. Hannah Fabikan received speaker fee from Roche. Sonja Loges received speaker fees, consultations, and honoraria for advisory boards from BerGenBio AS, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Roche Pharma, Medac GmbH, Sanofi Aventis, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Takeda, Amgen, Bayer, Janssen, Merck, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, and art tempi and research grants from Eli Lilly, BerGenBi AS, and BMS. Arschang Valipour reported personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Menarini, Merck, Novartis, and Roche for lectures and/or advisory boards outside of the submitted study. Tobias Overbeck received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards by AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Tesaro/GSK, Lilly, and Roche and travel reimbursement by AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, and Roche. Frank Griesinger received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from ASTRA, Boehringer, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Ariad, Abbvie, Tesaro/GSK, Siemens, Tesaro, Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Beigene. Marko Jakopovic received speaker fees and/or honoraria for advisory boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Amgen. Maximilian Hochmair received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Roche and has had consulting or advisory roles with Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche. Martin Wermke reported honoraria from Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, SYNLAB, Janssen, Merck Serono, GWT TUD, Amngen, Novartis. Consulting/advisory: BMS, Novartis, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, ISA Pharmaceuticals, Immatics, Bayer, and ImCheck Therapeutics. Research funding: Roche. Travel/accomodation/expenses: BMS, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Amgen, GEMoaB, Sanofi/Aventis, Immatics, and Merck Serono. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Response of target lesions in treatment-naïve and pretreated patients. Best response to mobocertinib. Waterfall plot of maximum change in tumor size on imaging measured according to RECIST v1.1 in all target lesions between baseline and follow-up in pretreated and treatment-naïve patients. Both growth (+20%) and shrinkage (−30%) of tumors are indicated by the dashed lines. One patient experienced a tumor growth of 400%. For better illustration purposes, the Y-axis only shows 100%. Patients with no shrinkage or growth are shown with −1%. Eighteen patients are not shown because there was no measurable disease or because they had no adequate response for assessment. Four patients are not shown because retrospective measurement of lesions was not possible.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progression-free and overall survival from the start of mobocertinib treatment. Kaplan–Meier plots with 95% confidence intervals. Black rectangles mark censoring. The median PFS was 5 months (95% CI, 3.5–6.5). The median OS was 12 months (95% CI, 6.8–17.2).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mechanisms of resistance to mobocertinib. Upper panel: Potential mechanisms of resistance that have been detected in post- but not in pretreatment tissue biopsies. Paired samples were assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using custom DNA and RNA panels developed for recurrent genetic alterations in lung cancer, by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MET and HER2 amplification, and by a board-certified pathologist to identify transformation to small or squamous cell histology (lineage plasticity). Ampli: Amplification (superscript indicates whether it was detected by NGS or FISH). GCN: Gene copy number. MET/c7: Ratio of MET signals to centromere 7 signals in FISH. §: Posttreatment sample was a cerebrospinal fluid cytology specimen. Therefore, only a small NGS panel analysis could be performed. $: Pretreatment biopsy could only be analyzed for hotspots in BRAF, EGFR, and KRAS (Sanger sequencing). &: Both samples were liquid biopsies analyzed for plasma-circulating tumor DNA. Lower left panel: 3D-models of EGFR TK complexes with TKI mobocertinib (teal) and its competitive substrate ATP (magenta) obtained from MD: (A) p.768_770dup with mobocertinib: a flexible P-loop assumes a conformation when its F723 forms a hydrophobic contact with mobocertinib, shielding it from solvent; (B) p.768_770dup + p.G721S with mobocertinib: S721 forms hydrogen bond(s) with F723 and G724, rigidifying the P-loop and shifting F723 away from the binding pocket, exposing mobocertinib to the solvent; (C) p.768_770dup with ATP: the P-loop does not interact with ATP; (D) p.768_770dup + G721S with ATP: S721 forms an additional hydrogen bond with oxygens in ATP, either directly or mediated by water molecules. Key amino acid residues interacting with the ligands are shown as thin sticks. A magnesium ion in complexes with ATP is shown as a green sphere. Key hydrogen bonds formed by the Ser721 (black) are shown with green dashes. Non-polar hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules are hidden for better visibility. Images were created with PyMOL. Lower right panel: Analysis of the EGFR p.G721S mutation in the Ba/F3 cell model. Cells retrovirally transduced with overexpression vectors encoding the EGFR exon 20 insertion p.S768_D770dup alone or in combination with the acquired EGFR p.G721S variant; controls were deprived of IL-3 and treated with increasing concentrations of mobocertinib. Proportional proliferation compared to the DMSO control and half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for mobocertinib are provided.

References

    1. Riess J.W., Gandara D.R., Frampton G.M., Madison R., Peled N., Bufill J.A., Dy G.K., Ou S.-H.I., Stephens P.J., McPherson J.D., et al. Diverse EGFR Exon 20 Insertions and Co-Occurring Molecular Alterations Identified by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of NSCLC. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2018;13:1560–1568. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.06.019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ou S.-H.I., Hong J.-L., Christopoulos P., Lin H.M., Vincent S., Churchill E.N., Soeda J., Kazdal D., Stenzinger A., Thomas M. Distribution and Detectability of EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Variants in NSCLC. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2023;18:744–754. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.01.086. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ou S.-H.I., Lin H.M., Hong J.-L., Yin Y., Jin S., Lin J., Mehta M., Nguyen D., Neal J.W. Real-world Response and Outcomes in Patients with NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 2023;4:100558. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100558. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christopoulos P., Kluck K., Kirchner M., Lüders H., Roeper J., Falkenstern-Ge R.-F., Szewczyk M., Sticht F., Saalfeld F.C., Wesseler C., et al. The impact of TP53 co-mutations and immunologic microenvironment on outcome of lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertions. Eur. J. Cancer. 2022;170:106–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Girard N., Minchom A., Ou S.-H.I., Gadgeel S.M., Trigo J., Viteri S., Bauml J.M., Londhe A., Mahadevia P., Bazhenova L. Comparative Clinical Outcomes Between EGFR Ex20ins and Wildtype NSCLC Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Clin. Lung Cancer. 2022;23:571–577. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2022.07.007. - DOI - PubMed