GRADE guidance 37: rating imprecision in a body of evidence on test accuracy
- PMID: 38613246
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.005
GRADE guidance 37: rating imprecision in a body of evidence on test accuracy
Abstract
Objectives: To provide guidance on rating imprecision in a body of evidence assessing the accuracy of a single test. This guide will clarify when Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) users should consider rating down the certainty of evidence by one or more levels for imprecision in test accuracy.
Study design and setting: A project group within the GRADE working group conducted iterative discussions and presentations at GRADE working group meetings to produce this guidance.
Results: Before rating the certainty of evidence, GRADE users should define the target of their certainty rating. GRADE recommends setting judgment thresholds defining what they consider a very accurate, accurate, inaccurate, and very inaccurate test. These thresholds should be set after considering consequences of testing and effects on people-important outcomes. GRADE's primary criterion for judging imprecision in test accuracy evidence is considering confidence intervals (i.e., CI approach) of absolute test accuracy results (true and false, positive, and negative results in a cohort of people). Based on the CI approach, when a CI appreciably crosses the predefined judgment threshold(s), one should consider rating down certainty of evidence by one or more levels, depending on the number of thresholds crossed. When the CI does not cross judgment threshold(s), GRADE suggests considering the sample size for an adequately powered test accuracy review (optimal or review information size [optimal information size (OIS)/review information size (RIS)]) in rating imprecision. If the combined sample size of the included studies in the review is smaller than the required OIS/RIS, one should consider rating down by one or more levels for imprecision.
Conclusion: This paper extends previous GRADE guidance for rating imprecision in single test accuracy systematic reviews and guidelines, with a focus on the circumstances in which one should consider rating down one or more levels for imprecision.
Keywords: GRADE; Guideline; Imprecision; Systematic review; Test accuracy; Threshold.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no direct financial conflict of interest. They are members or contributors to the GRADE working group. Multiple coauthors have served as methodologists on a number of systematic reviews or guidelines that provided examples for this manuscript.
Similar articles
-
GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach.J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:216-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Aug 4. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 35934265
-
Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Apr 6. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 27063205
-
GRADE guidance 35: update on rating imprecision for assessing contextualized certainty of evidence and making decisions.J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:225-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Aug 5. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 35934266
-
[How to interpret the certainty of evidence based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation)].Urologe A. 2021 Apr;60(4):444-454. doi: 10.1007/s00120-021-01471-2. Epub 2021 Feb 23. Urologe A. 2021. PMID: 33620513 Review. German.
-
When applying GRADE, how do we decide the target of certainty of evidence rating?Evid Based Ment Health. 2021 Jun 14;24(3):121-3. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300170. Online ahead of print. Evid Based Ment Health. 2021. PMID: 34127510 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Low-complexity automated nucleic acid amplification tests for extrapulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 4;8(8):CD012768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012768.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40757508 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources