Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan:165:111189.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.005. Epub 2023 Oct 28.

GRADE guidance 37: rating imprecision in a body of evidence on test accuracy

Affiliations

GRADE guidance 37: rating imprecision in a body of evidence on test accuracy

Reem A Mustafa et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To provide guidance on rating imprecision in a body of evidence assessing the accuracy of a single test. This guide will clarify when Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) users should consider rating down the certainty of evidence by one or more levels for imprecision in test accuracy.

Study design and setting: A project group within the GRADE working group conducted iterative discussions and presentations at GRADE working group meetings to produce this guidance.

Results: Before rating the certainty of evidence, GRADE users should define the target of their certainty rating. GRADE recommends setting judgment thresholds defining what they consider a very accurate, accurate, inaccurate, and very inaccurate test. These thresholds should be set after considering consequences of testing and effects on people-important outcomes. GRADE's primary criterion for judging imprecision in test accuracy evidence is considering confidence intervals (i.e., CI approach) of absolute test accuracy results (true and false, positive, and negative results in a cohort of people). Based on the CI approach, when a CI appreciably crosses the predefined judgment threshold(s), one should consider rating down certainty of evidence by one or more levels, depending on the number of thresholds crossed. When the CI does not cross judgment threshold(s), GRADE suggests considering the sample size for an adequately powered test accuracy review (optimal or review information size [optimal information size (OIS)/review information size (RIS)]) in rating imprecision. If the combined sample size of the included studies in the review is smaller than the required OIS/RIS, one should consider rating down by one or more levels for imprecision.

Conclusion: This paper extends previous GRADE guidance for rating imprecision in single test accuracy systematic reviews and guidelines, with a focus on the circumstances in which one should consider rating down one or more levels for imprecision.

Keywords: GRADE; Guideline; Imprecision; Systematic review; Test accuracy; Threshold.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no direct financial conflict of interest. They are members or contributors to the GRADE working group. Multiple coauthors have served as methodologists on a number of systematic reviews or guidelines that provided examples for this manuscript.

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources