Current Perspectives and Progress in Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization with Stem Cell Augmentation (PVESA)
- PMID: 38613627
- PMCID: PMC11222268
- DOI: 10.1007/s12015-024-10719-1
Current Perspectives and Progress in Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization with Stem Cell Augmentation (PVESA)
Abstract
Portal vein embolization with stem cell augmentation (PVESA) is an emerging approach for enhancing the growth of the liver segment that will remain after surgery (i.e., future liver remnant, FLR) in patients with liver cancer. Conventional portal vein embolization (PVE) aims to induce preoperative FLR growth, but it has a risk of failure in patients with underlying liver dysfunction and comorbid illnesses. PVESA combines PVE with stem cell therapy to potentially improve FLR size and function more effectively and efficiently. Various types of stem cells can help improve liver growth by secreting paracrine signals for hepatocyte growth or by transforming into hepatocytes. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), unrestricted somatic stem cells, and small hepatocyte-like progenitor cells have been used to augment liver growth in preclinical animal models, while clinical studies have demonstrated the benefit of CD133 + bone marrow-derived MSCs and hematopoietic stem cells. These investigations have shown that PVESA is generally safe and enhances liver growth after PVE. However, optimizing the selection, collection, and application of stem cells remains crucial to maximize benefits and minimize risks. Additionally, advanced stem cell technologies, such as priming, genetic modification, and extracellular vesicle-based therapy, that could further enhance efficacy outcomes should be evaluated. Despite its potential, PVESA requires more investigations, particularly mechanistic studies that involve orthotopic animal models of liver cancer with concomitant liver injury as well as larger human trials.
Keywords: Future liver remnant; Hematopoietic stem cells; Liver hypertrophy; Mesenchymal stem Cells; PVESA; Portal vein embolization; Portal vein ligation.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Not applicable.
Figures




References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. C Ca: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021;71(3):209–249. - PubMed
-
- Makuuchi M, Takayasu K, Takuma T, Yamazaki S, Hasegawa H, Nishiura S, Shimamura Y. Preoperative transcatheter embolization of the portal venous branch for patients receiving extended lobectomy due to the bile duct carcinoma. Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association) 1984;45:1558–1564.
-
- Shindoh J, Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, Curley SA, Huang SY, Mahvash A, Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Aloia TA. Analysis of the efficacy of portal vein embolization for patients with extensive liver malignancy and very low future liver remnant volume, including a comparison with the associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy approach. American Journal of Surgery. 2013;217(1):126–133. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cassese G, Han HS, Lee B, Cho JY, Lee HW, Guiu B, Panaro F. Troisi R. I. Portal vein embolization failure: Current strategies and future perspectives to improve liver hypertrophy before major oncological liver resection. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 2022;14(11):2088–2096. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i11.2088. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials