Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Apr 13;42(1):234.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04933-2.

Ureteral stricture rate after endoscopic treatments for urolithiasis and related risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Ureteral stricture rate after endoscopic treatments for urolithiasis and related risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis

S Moretto et al. World J Urol. .

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to accurately determine ureteral stricture (US) rates following urolithiasis treatments and their related risk factors.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines using databases from inception to November 2023. Studies were deemed eligible for analysis if they included ≥ 18 years old patients with urinary lithiasis (Patients) who were subjected to endoscopic treatment (Intervention) with ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), or shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) (Comparator) to assess the incidence of US (Outcome) in prospective and retrospective studies (Study design).

Results: A total of 43 studies were included. The pooled US rate was 1.3% post-SWL and 2.1% post-PCNL. The pooled rate of US post-URS was 1.9% but raised to 2.7% considering the last five years' studies and 4.9% if the stone was impacted. Moreover, the pooled US rate differed if follow-ups were under or over six months. Patients with proximal ureteral stone, preoperative hydronephrosis, intraoperative ureteral perforation, and impacted stones showed higher US risk post-endoscopic intervention with odds ratio of 1.6 (P = 0.05), 2.6 (P = 0.009), 7.1 (P < 0.001), and 7.47 (P = 0.003), respectively.

Conclusions: The overall US rate ranges from 0.3 to 4.9%, with an increasing trend in the last few years. It is influenced by type of treatment, stone location and impaction, preoperative hydronephrosis and intraoperative perforation. Future standardized reporting and prospective and more extended follow-up studies might contribute to a better understanding of US risks related to calculi treatment.

Keywords: Endoscopic surgery; Iatrogenic ureteral injury; Risk factors; Stone disease; Stone treatment; Ureteral stricture.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. EAU Guidelines (2023) Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023. ISBN 978-94-92671-19-6
    1. Lang J, Narendrula A, El-Zawahry A et al (2022) Global trends in incidence and burden of urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019: an analysis of global burden of disease study data. Eur Urol Open Sci 35:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.008 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. De Coninck V, Keller EX, Somani B et al (2020) Complications of ureteroscopy: a complete overview. World J Urol 38:2147–2166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03012-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tonyali S, Pietropaolo A, Emiliani E et al (2023) Factors associated with ureteral strictures following ureteroscopy for impacted ureteral stones? A multicenter study by EAU-YAU endourology and urolithiasis working party. Actas Urol Esp S2173–5786(23):00045–00048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.04.005 - DOI
    1. Tonyali S, Yilmaz M, Tzelves L et al (2023) Predictors of ureteral strictures after retrograde ureteroscopic treatment of impacted ureteral stones: a systematic literature review. J Clin Med 12:3603. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103603 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

MeSH terms