Diagnostic performance, stability, and acceptability of self-collected saliva without additives for SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnosis
- PMID: 38613706
- DOI: 10.1007/s10096-024-04819-6
Diagnostic performance, stability, and acceptability of self-collected saliva without additives for SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnosis
Abstract
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading to a global pandemic. The molecular diagnosis of this virus is mostly performed by collecting upper respiratory samples, which has many disadvantages, including patient discomfort and the need for trained healthcare professionals. Although saliva has emerged as a more comfortable sample, the use of additives to preserve viral RNA is expensive and, in some cases, difficult for self-collection.
Method: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance by RT-PCR and stability of self-collected saliva using wide-mouth specimen collection cups without stabilization and/or inactivation buffers for SARS-CoV-2 detection, compared to nasopharyngeal samples and saliva collected with additives. Additionally, the study assessed the acceptability of this sample collection method among participants and healthcare personnel.
Results: The study included 1281 volunteers with a 24.6% positive infection rate. Saliva demonstrated comparable diagnostic performance to nasopharyngeal samples, with a sensitivity of 87.6% and specificity of 99.6%, for a total percent agreement of 96.4%. The study also showed that viral RNA in saliva remained stable for at least 72 h at different temperatures. Notably, saliva samples without additives exhibited a lower RdRp Ct compared to samples with additives, suggesting that the absence of stabilization and/or inactivation buffers does not significantly affect its performance. The study highlighted the acceptability of saliva among patients and healthcare personnel due to its noninvasive nature and ease of collection.
Conclusions: This research supports the implementation of self-collected saliva as a comfortable and user-friendly alternative sample for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis.
Keywords: Acceptability; COVID-19; Performance; Saliva; Self-collection; Stability.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3. Microbiol Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34730436 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations.Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0006221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00062-21. Epub 2021 Aug 25. Microbiol Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34431689 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of self-collected nasal, urine, and saliva samples for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 using an EUA approved RT-PCR assay and a laboratory developed LAMP SARS-CoV-2 test.Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Jun;12(6):e1285. doi: 10.1002/iid3.1285. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024. PMID: 38888444 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: Saliva or nasopharyngeal swab? Rapid review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0253007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253007. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34111196 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1233-1245. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00146-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33857405 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive SARS-CoV-2 screening tests: a national prospective analysis.BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 21;25(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11088-x. BMC Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 40399889 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Storage stability of non-encapsulated pneumococci in saliva is dependent on null-capsule clade, with strains carrying aliC and aliD showing a competitive disadvantage during culture enrichment.Microbiology (Reading). 2025 Aug;171(8):001585. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001585. Microbiology (Reading). 2025. PMID: 40748653 Free PMC article.
-
Simplified Co-extraction of total Nucleic Acids from Respiratory Samples for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and SARS-CoV-2 optimized for compatibility across Diagnostic Platforms.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Mar 3:2025.02.27.25322880. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.27.25322880. medRxiv. 2025. PMID: 40093238 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
Updating on the Dual Role of Salivary Gland Epithelial Cell (SGEC) in Sjögren's Disease.J Inflamm Res. 2025 Mar 1;18:3039-3053. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S509220. eCollection 2025. J Inflamm Res. 2025. PMID: 40046682 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard | WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard With Vaccination Data [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Feb 15]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/
-
- Kandel CE, Young M, Serbanescu MA, Powis JE, Bulir D, Callahan J et al (2021) Detection of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in outpatients: a multicenter comparison of self-collected saline gargle, oral swab, and combined oral-anterior nasal swab to a provider collected nasopharyngeal swab. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 42:1340–1344 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous