6. Persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2
- PMID: 38616347
- DOI: 10.1111/papr.13379
6. Persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2
Abstract
Introduction: Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS) refers to chronic axial pain and/or extremity pain. Two subtypes have been defined: PSPS-type 1 is chronic pain without previous spinal surgery and PSPS-type 2 is chronic pain, persisting after spine surgery, and is formerly known as Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) or post-laminectomy syndrome. The etiology of PSPS-type 2 can be gleaned using elements from the patient history, physical examination, and additional medical imaging. Origins of persistent pain following spinal surgery may be categorized into an inappropriate procedure (eg a lumbar fusion at an incorrect level or for sacroiliac joint [SIJ] pain); technical failure (eg operation at non-affected levels, retained disk fragment, pseudoarthrosis), biomechanical sequelae of surgery (eg adjacent segment disease or SIJ pain after a fusion to the sacrum, muscle wasting, spinal instability); and complications (eg battered root syndrome, excessive epidural fibrosis, and arachnoiditis), or undetermined.
Methods: The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of PSPS-type 2 was retrieved and summarized.
Results: There is low-quality evidence for the efficacy of conservative treatments including exercise, rehabilitation, manipulation, and behavioral therapy, and very limited evidence for the pharmacological treatment of PSPS-type 2. Interventional treatments such as pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the dorsal root ganglia, epidural adhesiolysis, and spinal endoscopy (epiduroscopy) might be beneficial in patients with PSPS-type 2. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for chronic, intractable neuropathic limb pain, and possibly well-selected candidates with axial pain.
Conclusions: The diagnosis of PSPS-type 2 is based on patient history, clinical examination, and medical imaging. Low-quality evidence exists for conservative interventions. Pulsed radiofrequency, adhesiolysis and SCS have a higher level of evidence with a high safety margin and should be considered as interventional treatment options when conservative treatment fails.
Keywords: back pain; evidence‐based medic.
© 2024 The Authors. Pain Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of World Institute of Pain.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Van Boxem K, Cheng J, Patijn J, van Kleef M, Lataster A, Mekhail N, et al. 11. Lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain Pract. 2010;10:339–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533‐2500.2010.00370.x
-
- Christelis N, Simpson B, Russo M, Stanton‐Hicks M, Barolat G, Thomson S, et al. Persistent spinal pain syndrome: A proposal for failed Back surgery syndrome and ICD‐11. Pain Med. 2021;22:807–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnab015
-
- Dworkin RH, Backonja M, Rowbotham MC, Allen RR, Argoff CR, Bennett GJ, et al. Advances in neuropathic pain: diagnosis, mechanisms, and treatment recommendations. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:1524–1534.
-
- Alshammari HS, Alshammari AS, Alshammari SA, Ahamed SS. Prevalence of chronic pain after spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Cureus. 2023;15:e41841. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41841
-
- IASP. International Association for the Study of Pain presidential task force on cannabis and cannabinoid analgesia position statement. Pain. 2021;162:S1–S2. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002265
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
