Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb:228:192-198.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.024. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

Defining Ultra-Massive Transfusion through a Systematic Review

Affiliations

Defining Ultra-Massive Transfusion through a Systematic Review

Courtney H Meyer et al. Am J Surg. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Despite the widespread use of ultra-massive transfusion (UMT) as an intervention for trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock, no standard definition exists. We performed a systematic review to determine a consensus definition for UMT.

Methods: A search was performed from 1979-2022. The authors screened studies defining UMT and associated outcomes as defined by our prespecified PICO questions. The PRISMA guidelines were used.

Results: 1662 articles met criteria for eligibility assessment, 17 for full-text review and eight for data extraction. Only two studies demonstrated a consensus definition of UMT, which used ≥20 units of red blood cell product within 24hrs. Parameters associated with increased mortality included lower blood pressure, lower pulse and lower Glasgow Coma Score at the time of presentation and a higher injury severity score and undergoing a resuscitative thoracotomy.

Conclusions: The absence of a consensus definition for UMT raises challenges from clinical, research and ethical perspectives. Based on our findings, the authors advocate for the feasibility of standardizing the definition of UMT as ≥20 units of red blood cell product within 24hrs.

Keywords: Blood transfusion; consensus definition; systematic review; trauma patient; ultra-massive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Search terms for MEDLINE/PubMed
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Search strategy for MEDLINE/PubMed

References

    1. Callcut RAM, Kornblith LZM, Conroy ASB, et al. The why and how our trauma patients die: A prospective Multicenter Western Trauma Association study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;86(5):864–870. 10.1097/TA.0000000000002205 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson P, Strandenes G. (2020). The History of Fluid Resuscitation for Bleeding. In: Spinella P. (ed) Damage Control Resuscitation. Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978-3-030-20820-2_1 - DOI
    1. Leibner E, Andreae M, Galvagno SM, Scalea T. Damage control resuscitation. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020. Mar;7(1):5–13. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.089. Epub 2020 Mar 31. PMID: 32252128; PMCID: PMC7141982. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McQuilten ZK, Flint AWJ, Green L, et al. (2021). Epidemiology of massive transfusion – A common intervention in need of a definition. Transfusion Medicine Reviews, 35(4), 73–79. 10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.08.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matthay ZA, Hellmann ZJ, Callcut RA, et al. (2021). Outcomes after ultramassive transfusion in the modern era: An Eastern Association for the surgery of trauma multicenter study. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 91(1), 24–33. 10.1097/TA.0000000000003121 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources