Political Self-Confidence and Affective Polarization
- PMID: 38617050
- PMCID: PMC11014683
- DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad064
Political Self-Confidence and Affective Polarization
Abstract
Even among those who share the same partisan commitments, some people say they despise the opposing party while others report far less animosity. Why are some people more likely to express hostility toward the opposing political party? We explore how individual-level differences in feelings of self-confidence fuel out-party animosities. Drawing on responses to a module of the 2020 Cooperative Election Study, we show that higher levels of internal political efficacy are associated with greater affective polarization. Those who feel self-assured about their political abilities are more likely to admit severing social ties with those who disagree with them and are more tolerant of discrimination against partisan opponents. In a survey experiment, we confirm that those with greater internal efficacy are also more likely to accept discrimination against a member of the opposing party. Affective polarization is greatest among those who feel the most confident of their ability to influence politics.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Association for Public Opinion Research.
Figures
References
-
- Abramowitz Alan I., Webster Steven. 2016. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41:12–22.
-
- Abramson Paul R., Aldrich John H.. 1982. “The Decline of Electoral Participation in America.” American Political Science Review 76:502–21.
-
- Acock Alan, Clarke Harold D., Stewart Marianne C.. 1985. “A New Model for Old Measures: A Covariance Structure Analysis of Political Efficacy.” The Journal of Politics 47:1062–84.
-
- Almond Gabriel A., Verba Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
-
- Arceneaux Kevin, Vander Wielen Ryan. 2017. Taming Intuition: How Reflection Minimizes Partisan Reasoning and Promotes Democratic Accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources