Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;19(2):971-977.
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Jul 19.

Influence of thermal aging on the marginal integrity of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing fabricated crowns

Affiliations

Influence of thermal aging on the marginal integrity of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing fabricated crowns

Diana Lopez et al. J Dent Sci. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Background/purpose: The adaptation and marginal integrity of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) crowns after exposure to thermal aging need to be investigated. The present in-vitro study was designed to investigate the marginal integrity of CAD/CAM fabricated crowns cemented on extracted teeth after thermocycling aging.

Materials and methods: Twenty-six newly extracted human premolars were prepared for full-coverage CAD/CAM crowns and were divided into two groups (leucite-reinforced glass-ceramics and lithium disilicate glass-ceramics). Both crowns' groups were cemented using dual curing resin cement. All specimen margins were measured for marginal integrity using an imaging system 24 h post cementation; then after 1, 3, and 5 estimated clinical years (10,000, 30,000, and 50,000 thermocycles). Two-way ANOVA analysis were used to determine whether the mean value difference is significantly different (ɑ = 0.05).

Results: The average margin gaps recorded for leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns were: 82.61 μm initial, and 91.02 μm after 5 estimated clinical year). For the lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crowns, the average margin gaps recorded were: 100.01 μm initial, and 120.21 μm after 5 estimated clinical year. During all measuring intervals, the leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crown group had a lower marginal discrepancy. No statistically significant difference between the two groups was recorded.

Conclusion: After being subjected to thermocycling, both CAD/CAM ceramic crowns, exhibited an increase in their marginal discrepancy; the difference was within the accepted clinical range.

Keywords: CAD/CAM crowns; Lithium discilicate glass-ceramics; Lithium-reinforced glass-ceramics; Marginal integrity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest with respective to the research and publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Figure 1
Tooth VPS model for the standardization of the preparation.
Fig. 2
Figure 2
Scanning and digital processing of the crowns.
Fig. 3
Figure 3
Average marginal gap for the examined crowns up to five simulated clinical years.
Fig. 4
Figure 4
Leucite reinforced sample at initial (A); 10,000 cycles (B); 30,000 cycles (C); and 50,000 cycles (D).
Fig. 5
Figure 5
Lithium disilicate sample at initial (A); 10,000 cycles (B); 30,000 cycles (C); and 50,000 cycles (D).

References

    1. Reiss B. Long-term clinical performance of CEREC restorations and the variables affecting treatment success. Comp Cont Educ Dent. 2001;22:14–18. - PubMed
    1. Chiang H., Staffen A., Abdulmajeed A.A., Janus C., Bencharit S. Effectiveness of cad/cam technology: a self-assessment tool for preclinical waxing exercise. Eur J Dent Educ. 2021;25:50–55. - PubMed
    1. Shi H.Y., Pang R., Yang J., et al. Overview of several typical ceramic materials for restorative dentistry. BioMed Res Int. 2022;2022 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sulaiman T.A. Materials in digital dentistry—a review. J Esthetic Restor Dent. 2020;3:171–181. - PubMed
    1. Wendler M., Belli R., Petschelt A., et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 2: flexural strength testing. Dent Mater. 2017;33:99–109. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources