Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 13;16(3):e56078.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.56078. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Assessing the Influence of Thermocycling on Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, and Microhardness in Green-Mediated Nanocomposite-Enhanced Glass Ionomer Cement Compared to Traditional Glass Ionomer Cement

Affiliations

Assessing the Influence of Thermocycling on Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, and Microhardness in Green-Mediated Nanocomposite-Enhanced Glass Ionomer Cement Compared to Traditional Glass Ionomer Cement

Bharath Ravi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background and objective Glass ionomer cement (GIC), also known as polyalkenoate cement, has been extensively used in dentistry for both luting and restorative purposes. Despite being the first choice for aesthetic restorations due to their chemical bonding ability to teeth, GICs have faced challenges such as low mechanical properties, abrasion resistance, and sensitivity to moisture, leading to the search for improved materials. This study aims to assess the effects of thermocycling on the compressive, flexural strength, and microhardness of green-mediated nanocomposite-modified GIC in comparison to traditional GIC. Methodology Green-mediated nanoparticles, consisting of chitosan, titanium, zirconia, and hydroxyapatite (Ch-Ti-Zr-HA), were synthesized using a one-pot synthesis technique to form nanocomposites. These nanocomposites were then incorporated into GIC specimens in varying concentrations (3%, 5%, and 10%), denoted as Group I, Group II, and Group III, respectively. Group IV served as the control, consisting of conventional GIC. To assess the performance of the novel restorative materials over an extended period, compressive strength, flexural strength, and microhardness were measured before and after thermocycling using a universal material testing machine. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was carried out following the thermocycling process. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-tests. Results The findings demonstrated that, in comparison to the control group, both the mean compressive strength and flexural strength, as well as hardness, were notably higher for the 10% and 5% nanocomposite-modified GIC specimens before and after thermocycling (P < 0.05). Notably, there was no notable difference observed between the 5% and 10% concentrations (P > 0.05). These results suggest that incorporating green-mediated nanocomposites (Ch-Ti-Zr-HA) modified GIC at either 5% or 10% concentration levels leads to improved mechanical properties, indicating their potential as promising alternatives in dental restorative materials. Conclusions Based on our findings, it can be inferred that the 10% and 5% concentrations of green-mediated (Ch-Ti-Zr-HA) modified GIC exhibit superior compressive and flexural strength compared to conventional GIC. Additionally, analysis of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) morphology revealed that green-mediated GIC displays smoother surface characteristics in contrast to conventional GIC. These results underscore the potential advantages of utilizing green-mediated nanocomposite-modified GIC in dental applications, suggesting enhanced mechanical properties and surface quality over conventional.

Keywords: green-mediated nanoparticles; microhardness; nanocomposite-modified gic; strength; thermocycling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Samples undergoing immersion within a thermocycler.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Compressive strength analysis performed with UTM.
UTM, universal testing machine
Figure 3
Figure 3. Flexural strength analysis performed with UTM.
UTM, universal testing machine
Figure 4
Figure 4. Microhardness analysis performed using a Vickers Hardness Tester.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Representative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the glass ionomer cement (GIC) surface after thermocycling.
(A) Group I (3%); (B) Group II (5%); (C) Group III (10%); (D) Group IV (control).

References

    1. Mechanical properties and bond strength of glass-ionomer cements. Pereira LC, Nunes MC, Dibb RG, Powers JM, Roulet JF, Navarro MF. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12071632/ J Adhes Dent. 2002;4:73–80. - PubMed
    1. Characterization and antimicrobial activity of cerium oxide nanoparticles synthesized using neem and ginger. Devi NS, Ganapathy DM, Rajeshkumar S, Maiti S. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022;13:0–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The influence of montmorillonite clay reinforcement on the performance of a glass ionomer restorative. Dowling AH, Stamboulis A, Fleming GJ. J Dent. 2006;34:802–810. - PubMed
    1. Effect of nanostructures on the properties of glass ionomer dental restoratives/cements: a comprehensive narrative review. Amin F, Rahman S, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS, Sefat F, Kumar N. Materials (Basel) 2021;14 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reinforcement of conventional glass-ionomer restorative material with short glass fibers. Hammouda IM. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009;2:73–81. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources