Rotator Cuff Tears: Correlation Between Clinical Examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopy

Abstract

Background Arthroscopy in diagnosing a rotator cuff injury has surgical and anaesthesia-related risks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a non-invasive procedure, is expensive, and lacks dynamic components making it less favourable. Clinical examination narrows the diagnosis, but lacks diagnostic accuracy due to overlap of clinical signs and symptoms. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination and MRI in rotator cuff tears by correlating it with arthroscopy. Methods This prospective, cross-sectional validation study included patients (N=28) with shoulder pain with clinical characteristics suggestive of rotator cuff tears. Clinical diagnoses and MRI were done preoperatively, following which each patient underwent arthroscopic surgery. Shoulder arthroscopy findings were correlated with those of clinical examination and MRI. Results The mean age of patients was 50.21±9.66 years, with 60.71% being males. Clinical examination was 100% sensitive and 73.8% specific for detecting rotator cuff tears. MRI was 92.85% sensitive and 98.8% specific in detecting rotator cuff tears. Shoulder MRI demonstrated a higher agreement with arthroscopy than clinical results for subscapularis, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres, and biceps tendon appearance. Conclusion MRI results in identifying rotator cuff pathologies are comparable with arthroscopy. Clinical examination findings are variable due to an examiner's bias and therefore its diagnostic scope is limited. However, clinical examination with MRI together might accurately identify the rotator cuff injury.

Keywords: arthroscopy; magnetic resonance imaging; physical examination; rotator cuff; shoulder pain.

Figure 1. MRI and arthroscopy findings of a rotator cuff

A - Coronal section MRI showing a rotator cuff tear B - Sagittal section MRI showing a supraspinatus tear C - Arthroscopic examination showing a supraspinatus tear