Parents of children with Down syndrome reflect on their postnatal diagnoses, 2003-2022
- PMID: 38619097
- DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63619
Parents of children with Down syndrome reflect on their postnatal diagnoses, 2003-2022
Abstract
A 2003 survey revealed the scope of mothers' dissatisfaction with their postnatal support following a diagnosis of Down syndrome (DS). Substantial proportions of mothers reported that providers conveyed diagnoses with pity, emphasized negative aspects of DS, and neglected to provide adequate materials explaining DS. This study follows up on the 2003 survey by assessing whether parents' experiences have improved. Four DS nonprofit organizations, which participated in the original study, distributed a mixed-methods survey to families who have had children with DS between 2003 and 2022. Quantitative analysis assessed correlations among responses and differences between the 2003 and 2022 survey groups. Open-ended responses were qualitatively analyzed. Compared to the 2003 findings, parents' perceptions of their postnatal care have not improved (N = 89). Parents are increasingly likely to report that their providers pitied them, omitted positive aspects of DS, and provided insufficient materials describing DS. Substantial proportions of parents reported fear (77%) and anxiety (79%), only 24% described receiving adequate explanatory materials, and parents were 45% likelier to report that physicians discussed negative aspects of DS than positive aspects. Qualitatively, substantial numbers of parents recounted insensitive conduct by providers. These results suggest that despite interventions, parents' experiences of postnatal diagnoses of DS have not improved over time. Certain provider behaviors-such as describing positive aspects of DS and providing comprehensive explanatory materials-can reduce fear and anxiety, pointing to directions for reform.
Keywords: Down syndrome; bias; birth; diagnosis; postnatal; trisomy 21.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Prenatal Care of Parents Who Continued Pregnancies With Down Syndrome, 2003-2022.Am J Med Genet A. 2025 May;197(5):e63981. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63981. Epub 2025 Jan 19. Am J Med Genet A. 2025. PMID: 39829122
-
Mothers of children with Down syndrome reflect on their postnatal support.Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):64-77. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0928. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15629983
-
Receiving the news of Down syndrome in the era of prenatal testing.Am J Med Genet A. 2020 Feb;182(2):374-385. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61438. Epub 2019 Dec 21. Am J Med Genet A. 2020. PMID: 31863634
-
Postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: synthesis of the evidence on how best to deliver the news.Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):e751-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0480. Epub 2009 Sep 28. Pediatrics. 2009. PMID: 19786436 Review.
-
Down syndrome: Parental experiences of a postnatal diagnosis.J Intellect Disabil. 2023 Dec;27(4):1032-1044. doi: 10.1177/17446295221106151. Epub 2022 Jun 14. J Intellect Disabil. 2023. PMID: 35698902 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Rethinking the Burden of Traditional Informed Consent Prior to Prenatal Genetic Screening.Hastings Cent Rep. 2025 Mar;55(2):29-38. doi: 10.1002/hast.4976. Hastings Cent Rep. 2025. PMID: 40245273
-
Lack of provision of social and emotional information about Down syndrome associated with negative prenatal diagnosis experiences.J Community Genet. 2025 Jun;16(3):243-254. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00801-7. Epub 2025 May 15. J Community Genet. 2025. PMID: 40372673 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ansong, E. O., Jones, K., & Santoro, S. L. (2023). Timing of referrals to a Down syndrome parent group by race. Pediatric Quality and Safety, 8(1), e632. https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000632
-
- Fisher, S. D. (2016). Paternal mental health: Why is it relevant? American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 11(3), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827616629895
-
- Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Minor, B. L., Elliott, V., Fernandez, M., O'Neal, L., McLeod, L., Delacqua, G., Delacqua, F., Kirby, J., Duda, S. N., & REDCap Consortium. (2019). The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 95, 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
-
- Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)—A metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
-
- Heeringa, S. G., West, B., & Berglund, P. A. (2017). Applied survey data analysis. CDC Press.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical