Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;89(7):1879-1890.
doi: 10.2166/wst.2024.079. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

Treatment of tomato paste wastewater by electrochemical and membrane processes: process optimization and cost calculation

Aliye Şen  1 , Ceyhun Akarsu  2 , Zeynep Bilici  1 , Hudaverdi Arslan  1 , Nadir Dizge  3
Affiliations

Treatment of tomato paste wastewater by electrochemical and membrane processes: process optimization and cost calculation

Aliye Şen et al. Water Sci Technol. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

This study investigated the treatment of wastewater from tomato paste (TP) production using electrocoagulation (EC) and electrooxidation (EO). The effectiveness of water recovery from the pretreated water was then investigated using the membrane process. For this purpose, the effects of independent control variables, including electrode type (aluminum, iron, graphite, and stainless steel), current density (25-75 A/m2), and electrolysis time (15-120 min) on chemical oxygen demand (COD) and color removal were investigated. The results showed that 81.0% of COD and 100% of the color removal were achieved by EC at a current density of 75 A/m2, a pH of 6.84 and a reaction time of 120 min aluminum electrodes. In comparison, EO with graphite electrodes achieved 55.6% of COD and 100% of the color removal under similar conditions. The operating cost was calculated to be in the range of $0.56-30.62/m3. Overall, the results indicate that EO with graphite electrodes is a promising pretreatment process for the removal of various organics. In the membrane process, NP030, NP010, and NF90 membranes were used at a volume of 250 mL and 5 bar. A significant COD removal rate of 94% was achieved with the membrane. The combination of EC and the membrane process demonstrated the feasibility of water recovery from TP wastewater.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness analysis; electrocoagulation; electrooxidation; membrane process; optimization; tomato paste wastewater.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adou K. E., Kouakou A. R., Ehouman A. D., Tyagi R. D., Drogui P. & Adouby K. 2022 Coupling anaerobic digestion process and electrocoagulation using iron and aluminium electrodes for slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Scientific African 16, e01238.
    1. Akarsu C., Deveci E. Ü., Gönen Ç. & Madenli Ö. 2021 Treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater by electrocoagulation and electroflotation as a combined process: Process optimization through response surface methodology. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 28, 34473–34488. - PubMed
    1. Akarsu C., Isik Z., M'barek I., Bouchareb R. & Dizge N. 2022 Treatment of personal care product wastewater for reuse by integrated electrocoagulation and membrane filtration processes. Journal of Water Process Engineering 48, 102879.
    1. Akbay H. E. G., Akarsu C. & Kumbur H. 2019 Investigation of electrocoagulation process for the removal of phosphate: Full-scale process optimization, operation cost and adsorption kinetics. Desalination and Water Treatment 155, 168–174.
    1. Alam P. N., Yulianis, Pasya H. L., Aditya R., Aslam I. N. & Pontas K. 2022 Acid mine wastewater treatment using electrocoagulation method. Materials Today: Proceedings 63, 434–437.

LinkOut - more resources