Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 27:102841.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102841. Online ahead of print.

Toward a holistic approach to EdTech effectiveness: Lessons from Covid-19 research in Bangladesh, Ghana, Kenya, Pakistan, and Sierra Leone

Affiliations

Toward a holistic approach to EdTech effectiveness: Lessons from Covid-19 research in Bangladesh, Ghana, Kenya, Pakistan, and Sierra Leone

Susan Nicolai et al. Int J Educ Dev. .

Abstract

During school closures prompted by the Covid-19 pandemic, educational technology (EdTech) was often used to continue educational provision. In this article, we consider EdTech effectiveness using a holistic framework, and synthesise findings from 10 primary research studies of EdTech interventions conducted in low- and middle-income countries during the pandemic. The framework includes five main lenses: learning outcomes, enhancing equity, implementation context, cost and affordability, and alignment and scale. While in-person schooling has largely resumed, there continues to be further integration of EdTech into education systems globally. This analysis provides evidence-based insights and highlights knowledge gaps to shape holistic analysis of both EdTech mainstreaming and future research into the effective use of EdTech to strengthen learning.

Keywords: Covid-19 pandemic; Development; Educational technology; International education; Research synthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Framework for EdTech effectiveness used in the analysis of 10 primary research studies conducted during the Covid-19 pandemic, after Hollow and Jefferies (2022).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Range of methods used to collect data across studies. Primarily qualitative methods are shown in blue, while quantitative methods are in orange.

Similar articles

References

    1. Adam T. Digital literacy needs for online learning among peri-urban, marginalised youth in South Africa. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning. 2022;14(3):1–19. doi: 10.4018/IJMBL.310940. - DOI
    1. Addey C., Sellar S., Steiner-Khamsi G., Lingard B., Verger A. The rise of international large-scale assessments and rationales for participation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 2017;47(3):434–452.
    1. Adil F., Nazir R., Akhtar M. Investigating the impact on learning outcomes through the use of EdTech during Covid-19: Evidence from an RCT in the Punjab province of Pakistan. EdTech Hub. 2021 doi: 10.53832/edtechhub.0067. - DOI
    1. Afoakwah E., Carballo F., Caro A., D’Cunha S., Dobrowolski S., Fallon A. Dialling up learning: Testing the impact of delivering educational content via interactive voice response to students and teachers in Ghana. EdTech Hub. 2021 doi: 10.53832/edtechhub.0051. - DOI
    1. Amenya D., Fitzpatrick R., Njeri M., E., Naylor R., Page E., Riggall A. The power of girls’ reading camps: Exploring the impact of radio lessons, peer learning and targeted paper-based resources on girls’ remote learning in Kenya. EdTech Hub. 2021 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5651935. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources