Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985 Oct;75(10):1204-8.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.10.1204.

Epidemiologic evaluation of screening for risk factors: application to genetic screening

Epidemiologic evaluation of screening for risk factors: application to genetic screening

M J Khoury et al. Am J Public Health. 1985 Oct.

Abstract

To assess the usefulness of screening for risk factors, we derived arithmetic relationships between screening parameters (sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value PPV) and risk factor frequency, disease frequency and relative risk. We evaluated these relationships in the special case of genetic markers and disease susceptibility. It can be shown that even in the face of very large relative risks, sensitivity and positive predictive value are affected by the relative magnitude of disease and genetic marker frequencies. When the genetic marker is less frequent than the disease, PPV increases with increasing relative risk but sensitivity remains low. When the genetic marker is more frequent than the disease, sensitivity increases with increasing relative risk but PPV remains low. When marker and disease frequencies are equal, both PPV and sensitivity increase with increasing relative risks, but very high relative risks (greater than 100) have to be obtained for rare diseases. Depending on the goals of the screening program, these relationships can be used to predict the relative magnitudes of false positives (low PPV) and false negatives (low sensitivity). This approach can be generalized to evaluate nongenetic risk factors in screening programs as well.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Occup Med. 1973 Jul;15(7):564-73 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Genet. 1975;9:67-89 - PubMed
    1. Med Hypotheses. 1981 Mar;7(3):393-9 - PubMed
    1. J Occup Med. 1982 May;24(5):369-74 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1982 Jul 23;217(4557):336-7 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources