Environmental DNA: The next chapter
- PMID: 38624076
- DOI: 10.1111/mec.17355
Environmental DNA: The next chapter
Abstract
Molecular tools are an indispensable part of ecology and biodiversity sciences and implemented across all biomes. About a decade ago, the use and implementation of environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect biodiversity signals extracted from environmental samples opened new avenues of research. Initial eDNA research focused on understanding population dynamics of target species. Its scope thereafter broadened, uncovering previously unrecorded biodiversity via metabarcoding in both well-studied and understudied ecosystems across all taxonomic groups. The application of eDNA rapidly became an established part of biodiversity research, and a research field by its own. Here, we revisit key expectations made in a land-mark special issue on eDNA in Molecular Ecology in 2012 to frame the development in six key areas: (1) sample collection, (2) primer development, (3) biomonitoring, (4) quantification, (5) behaviour of DNA in the environment and (6) reference database development. We pinpoint the success of eDNA, yet also discuss shortfalls and expectations not met, highlighting areas of research priority and identify the unexpected developments. In parallel, our retrospective couples a screening of the peer-reviewed literature with a survey of eDNA users including academics, end-users and commercial providers, in which we address the priority areas to focus research efforts to advance the field of eDNA. With the rapid and ever-increasing pace of new technical advances, the future of eDNA looks bright, yet successful applications and best practices must become more interdisciplinary to reach its full potential. Our retrospect gives the tools and expectations towards concretely moving the field forward.
Keywords: biomonitoring; eDNA behaviour; primers; quantification; reference database; sampling.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Agerbo Rasmussen, J., Nielsen, M., Mak, S. S., Döring, J., Klincke, F., Gopalakrishnan, S., Dunn, R. R., Kauer, R., & Gilbert, M. T. P. (2021). eDNA‐based biomonitoring at an experimental German vineyard to characterize how management regimes shape ecosystem diversity. Environmental DNA, 3(1), 70–82.
-
- Altermatt, F., Carraro, L., Antonetti, M., Albouy, C., Zhang, Y., Lyet, A., Zhang, X., & Pellissier, L. (2023). Quantifying biodiversity using eDNA from water bodies: General principles and recommendations for sampling designs. Environmental DNA, 5(4), 671–682.
-
- Altermatt, F., Little, C. J., Mächler, E., Wang, S., Zhang, X., & Blackman, R. C. (2020). Uncovering the complete biodiversity structure in spatial networks: The example of riverine systems. Oikos, 129(5), 607–618.
-
- Andersen, K., Bird, K. L., Rasmussen, M., Haile, J., Breuning‐Madsen, H., Kjaer, K. H., Orlando, L., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Willerslev, E. (2012). Meta‐barcoding of “dirt” DNA from soil reflects vertebrate biodiversity. Molecular Ecology, 21(8), 1966–1979.
-
- Andres, K. J., Lodge, D. M., Sethi, S. A., & Andrés, J. (2023). Detecting and analysing intraspecific genetic variation with eDNA: From population genetics to species abundance. Molecular Ecology, 32(15), 4118–4132.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- Universität Zürich
- PZ00P2_202010/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- 31003A_173074/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- University Research Priority Programme Global Change and Biodiversity
- ETH research commission and ETH board
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous