Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;50(3):397-404.
doi: 10.1007/s11426-007-0047-3.

Virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system

Affiliations

Virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system

Xiang Zheng et al. Sci China B Chem. 2007.

Abstract

A membrane bioreactor (MBR) with gravity drain was tested for virus rejection with two coliphages, T4 and f2, which were used as surrogates for human enteric viruses. Virus rejection was investigated by PVDF and PP membrane modules, with the pore sizes of 0.22 and 0.1 μm, respectively. In tap water system, 2.1 lg rejection of coliphage T4 could be achieved by PVDF membrane compared with complete rejection by PP membrane, while for coliphage f2 with smaller diameter, 0.3-0.5 lg rejection of the influent virus was removed by the two membranes. In domestic wastewater system, cake layer and gel layer on the membrane surface changed the cut-off size of the membrane so that there was no significant difference between PP and PVDF for each coliphage. The removal ratios of coliphage T4 and f2 in the MBR were more than 5.5 and 3.0 lg, respectively. Compared with 5.5 lg removal for virus T4 in the MBR system, only 2.1 lg (96.8%-99.9%) removal rate was observed in the conventional activated sludge system with the influent virus concentration fluctuating from 1830 to 57000 PFU/mL. Only 0.8%-22% virus removal was the effect of adsorption to activated sludge, which showed a decreasing tendency with the retention time, while 75%-98% was the effect of virus inactivation by microbial activity. It indicated that the major mechanism of virus removal was not the transfer of viruses from the water phase to the sludge phase but inactivation in the biological treatment process.

Keywords: MBR; enteric virus; inactivation; model virus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wei D. B., Hu H. Y., Wang L. S. Sanitary system of in reused wastewater. China Water & Wastewater (in Chinese) 2004;20(1):36–39.
    1. Qiu F. G., Wang X. C. Assessment on health effects of viruses in reused wastewater in city. J Environ Health (in Chinese) 2003;20(4):197–199.
    1. Zheng X., Lv W. Z., Yang M., Liu J. X. Evaluation of virus removal in MBR using coliphages T4. Chin Sci Bull. 2005;50(9):862–867. doi: 10.1360/04wb0087. - DOI
    1. Lv W. Z., Zheng X., Yang M., Liu J. X. Removal efficiency of viruses in simulated hospital wastewater by using a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochemistry. 2006;41:299–304. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.06.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gunder B., Krauth K. Replacement of secondary clarification by membrane separation-results with plate and hollow fibre modules. Wat Sci Tech. 1998;38(4–5):383–393. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00537-X. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources