Design, cohort profile and comparison of the KTD-Innov study: a prospective multidimensional biomarker validation study in kidney allograft rejection
- PMID: 38625480
- DOI: 10.1007/s10654-024-01112-w
Design, cohort profile and comparison of the KTD-Innov study: a prospective multidimensional biomarker validation study in kidney allograft rejection
Abstract
There is an unmet need for robust and clinically validated biomarkers of kidney allograft rejection. Here we present the KTD-Innov study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03582436), an unselected deeply phenotyped cohort of kidney transplant recipients with a holistic approach to validate the clinical utility of precision diagnostic biomarkers. In 2018-2019, we prospectively enrolled consecutive adult patients who received a kidney allograft at seven French centers and followed them for a year. We performed multimodal phenotyping at follow-up visits, by collecting clinical, biological, immunological, and histological parameters, and analyzing a panel of 147 blood, urinary and kidney tissue biomarkers. The primary outcome was allograft rejection, assessed at each visit according to the international Banff 2019 classification. We evaluated the representativeness of participants by comparing them with patients from French, European, and American transplant programs transplanted during the same period. A total of 733 kidney transplant recipients (64.1% male and 35.9% female) were included during the study. The median follow-up after transplantation was 12.3 months (interquartile range, 11.9-13.1 months). The cumulative incidence of rejection was 9.7% at one year post-transplant. We developed a distributed and secured data repository in compliance with the general data protection regulation. We established a multimodal biomarker biobank of 16,736 samples, including 9331 blood, 4425 urinary and 2980 kidney tissue samples, managed and secured in a collaborative network involving 7 clinical centers, 4 analytical platforms and 2 industrial partners. Patients' characteristics, immune profiles and treatments closely resembled those of 41,238 French, European and American kidney transplant recipients. The KTD-Innov study is a unique holistic and multidimensional biomarker validation cohort of kidney transplant recipients representative of the real-world transplant population. Future findings from this cohort are likely to be robust and generalizable.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Cohort profile; Kidney transplantation; Rejection; Study design.
© 2024. Springer Nature B.V.
Similar articles
-
Association Between Donor-Recipient Biological Relationship and Allograft Outcomes After Living Donor Kidney Transplant.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215718. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5718. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33847748 Free PMC article.
-
Subclinical Rejection Phenotypes at 1 Year Post-Transplant and Outcome of Kidney Allografts.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1721-31. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014040399. Epub 2015 Jan 2. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 25556173 Free PMC article.
-
Validating Early Post-Transplant Outcomes Reported for Recipients of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):324-31. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06950615. Epub 2015 Dec 14. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016. PMID: 26668026 Free PMC article.
-
Biomarkers in Kidney Transplantation.Adv Kidney Dis Health. 2024 Sep;31(5):427-435. doi: 10.1053/j.akdh.2024.06.001. Adv Kidney Dis Health. 2024. PMID: 39232613 Review.
-
Urinary Cell mRNA Profiles Predictive of Human Kidney Allograft Status.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Oct;16(10):1565-1577. doi: 10.2215/CJN.14010820. Epub 2021 Apr 27. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021. PMID: 33906907 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
To be or not to be, when synthetic data meet clinical pharmacology: A focused study on pharmacogenetics.CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2025 Jan;14(1):82-94. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13240. Epub 2024 Oct 16. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 39412034 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Muduma G, Odeyemi I, Smith-Palmer J, Pollock RF. Review of the clinical and economic burden of antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients. Adv Ther. 2016;33(3):345–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0292-y . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Loupy A, Mengel M, Haas M. Thirty years of the international banff classification for allograft pathology: the past, present, and future of kidney transplant diagnostics. Kidney Int. 2022;101(4):678–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2021.11.028 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Danger R, Le Berre L, Cadoux M, et al. Subclinical rejection-free diagnostic after kidney transplantation using blood gene expression. Kidney Int. 2023;103(6):1167–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2023.03.019 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lubetzky ML, Salinas T, Schwartz JE, Suthanthiran M. Urinary cell mRNA profiles predictive of human kidney allograft status. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;16(10):1565–77. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.14010820 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Rabant M, Amrouche L, Lebreton X, et al. Urinary C-X-C motif chemokine 10 independently improves the noninvasive diagnosis of antibody–mediated kidney allograft rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(11):2840–51. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2014080797 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical