The mobilisation of professional identity: A scoping and lexical review

Abstract

Interprofessional care obliges different healthcare professions to share decision-making and sometimes, practices. Given established hierarchies, it can be difficult to promote interprofessional care, partly because of the need to reshape professional identities. Despite interest in effective interprofessional care, there is limited research on how professional identity can be mobilised to promote it. A scoping review as well as lexical review of academic publications was conducted to address this void. After searching seven academic databases and screening the identified publications, 22 publications met the inclusion criteria. They collectively reported on 22 interventions, most of which were used in healthcare. The scoping review suggested there is some evidence that professional identities can be mobilised. Yet, of the 22 interventions, only ten explicitly targeted professional identity. The most common intervention was a training or development program, followed by workplace redesign. The need for internal motivation to mobilise professional identity was reported as was the impact of external drivers, like extending the scope of practice. Extending these findings, the lexical review demonstrated that, among the 22 publications, the relationship between professional identity and mobilisation did not feature prominently within the discourse. Furthermore, it seems that geography matters-that is, while all the publications spoke of professional identity, they differed by region on how they did this. Given these findings, concentrated scholarship is needed on the relationship between professional identity and interprofessional care, lest interprofessional care programs have limited, sustained effect. Implications for scholars and practitioners are explicated.

Fig 1. PRISMA flowchart [48].

Fig 2. Discovery mode concept map (visible concepts: 100%, theme size: 60%)¹.

¹ Colour code: red denotes the most important theme, followed by yellow, green, aqua, and purple.

Fig 3. Concept map after creating compound concepts (visible concepts: 100%, theme size: 60%)¹.

¹ Colour code: red denotes the most important theme, followed by yellow, green, and purple.

Fig 4. Concept map tagged by geography (visible concepts: 100%, theme size: 60%)¹.

¹ Colour code: red denotes the most important theme, followed by green and blue.