Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on short-term outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score matched and coarsened exact matched study
- PMID: 38626588
- PMCID: PMC12360403
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108309
Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on short-term outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score matched and coarsened exact matched study
Abstract
Background: In the last three decades, minimally invasive liver resection has been replacing conventional open approach in liver surgery. More recently, developments in neoadjuvant chemotherapy have led to increased multidisciplinary management of colorectal liver metastases with both medical and surgical treatment modalities. However, the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive liver resections remains poorly understood.
Methods: A multicenter, international, database of 4998 minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases was used to compare surgical outcomes in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone. To correct for baseline imbalance, propensity score matching, coarsened exact matching and inverse probability treatment weighting were performed.
Results: 2546 patients met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching there were 759 patients in both groups and 383 patients in both groups after coarsened exact matching. Baseline characteristics were equal after both matching strategies. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with statistically significant worse surgical outcomes of minimally invasive minor hepatectomy.
Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had no statistically significant impact on short-term surgical outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.
Keywords: Coarsened exact-matched; Colorectal liver metastases; Difficulty score; Inverse probability treatment weighting; Minimally invasive liver surgery; Minor hepatectomy; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Propensity-score matched.
© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
References
-
- Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Alikhanov R, Aroori S, Belli G, Besselink M, Briceno J et al. : The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation. Ann Surg 2018, 268(1):11–18. - PubMed
-
- Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, OʼRourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ et al. : Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 2015, 261(4):619–629. - PubMed
-
- Lee DH, Kim D, Park YH, Yoon J, Kim JS: Long-term surgical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study. Asian J Surg 2021, 44(1):206–212. - PubMed
-
- Haney CM, Studier-Fischer A, Probst P, Fan C, Müller PC, Golriz M, Diener MK, Hackert T, Müller-Stich BP, Mehrabi A et al. : A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 2021, 23(10):1467–1481. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
