Essential components of an educational program for implementing skin-to-skin contact for preterm infants in intensive care units: an integrative literature review
- PMID: 38627706
- PMCID: PMC11022346
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06447-6
Essential components of an educational program for implementing skin-to-skin contact for preterm infants in intensive care units: an integrative literature review
Abstract
Background: Globally, prematurity is the primary factor behind the mortality of children under the age of 5 years, resulting in approximately 1 million children dying annually. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends Skin-to-Skin Contact (SSC) as part of routine care for preterm infants. Evidence shows that SSC reduces mortality, possibly by improving thermoregulation, facilitating the earlier initiation of breastfeeding and reducing the risk of nosocomial infection. An educational program for implementing SSC has been demonstrated to enhance the knowledge and practice of parents and nurses in intensive care units. This study, the first of its kind in the North West Province (NWP), aims to identify the essential components of an educational program for implementing SSC for premature infants in intensive care units.
Objective: This paper presents an integrative literature review that critically synthesizes research-based literature on essential components of an educational program for implementing SSC for preterm infants in intensive care units.
Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases, such as CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ProQuest and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition and Health Source-Consumer Edition, was conducted using different keywords and references lists from the bibliography.
Results: Twelve articles relevant to this review were identified, read and synthesized to answer the research question. Three essential components emerged from the findings of this review, namely (1) the necessity of policy and role players for implementing SSC, (2) the availability of education and training, and (3) counseling and support for parents of preterm infants.
Conclusions: The outcomes of this study have the potential to facilitate the implementation and expansion of SSC in intensive care units. This could aid program implementers, policymakers, and researchers to implement and scale up this important tool in intensive care units.
Keywords: Educational program; Intensive care units; Parents; Preterm infants; Skin-to-skin contact.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Parents' experiences of transition when their infants are discharged from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):123-32. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2287. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26571288
-
Systematic Review of the Effects of Skin-to-Skin Care on Short-Term Physiologic Stress Outcomes in Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Adv Neonatal Care. 2020 Feb;20(1):48-58. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000596. Adv Neonatal Care. 2020. PMID: 30893092
-
Regular and prolonged skin-to-skin contact improves short-term outcomes for very preterm infants: A dose-dependent intervention.Arch Pediatr. 2018 Nov;25(8):469-475. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 16. Arch Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 30340943
-
Skin-to-Skin Contact for Transferring Preterm Infants from the Delivery Room to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Is Promising Despite Moderate Heat Loss during the Procedure.Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1037-e1044. doi: 10.1055/a-1979-8433. Epub 2022 Nov 16. Am J Perinatol. 2024. PMID: 36384235
-
Kangaroo mother care and skin-to-skin care in preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: A bibliometric analysis.Arch Pediatr. 2022 Feb;29(2):90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Dec 24. Arch Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 34955302 Review.
References
-
- Ohuma EO, Moller AB, Bradley E, Chakwera S, Hussain-Alkhateeb L, Lewin A, Okwaraji YB, Mahanani WR, Johansson EW, Lavin T, Fernandez DE. National, regional, and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2023;402(10409):1261–1271. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00878-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Perin J, Mulick A, Yeung D, Villavicencio F, Lopez G, Strong KL, Prieto-Merino D, Cousens S, Black RE, Liu L. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–19: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6(2):106–115. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00311-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- WHO. Preterm birth. WHO Publication. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth WHO. Care of the preterm and low-birth-weight newborn World Prematurity Day-17. Cited 2024 Mar 27
-
- Dorrington RE, Bradshaw D, Laubscher R, Nannan N. Rapid mortality surveillance report 2012. Cape Town, South Africa: Medical Research Council, Burden of Disease Research Unit. 2014;1:1–36.
-
- Howden-Chapman P, Siri J, Chisholm E, Chapman R, Doll CN, Capon A. SDG 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote wellbeing for all at all ages. A guide to SDG interactions: from science to implementation. Paris, France: International Council for Science; 2017. pp. 81–126.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical