Remaining silent during interrogation
- PMID: 38628249
- PMCID: PMC11017994
- DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2175074
Remaining silent during interrogation
Abstract
In many Western jurisdictions, criminal suspects undergoing police interrogations have the right to remain silent. In this experiment, we examined the effects of remaining silent during police questioning on laypersons' perceptions of a suspect. Participants (N = 126) read one of three mock-interview transcripts (i.e. admission, denial or silence) and indicated the extent to which they agreed or disagreed that a male suspect in a missing person case was guilty, cooperative, trustworthy and rational. Participants expressed stronger agreement that the suspect was guilty when he admitted guilt than when he denied involvement or remained silent. When the suspect remained silent, participants viewed the suspect as less cooperative than when the suspect denied or admitted guilt and as less rational than when the suspect denied committing the crime. Our findings provide some support for the notion that remaining silent during police questioning may be viewed unfavourably by external observers.
Keywords: Miranda; interrogation; investigative interview; legal rights; pragmatic implication; right to silence; suspect.
© 2023 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.
Conflict of interest statement
Mark D. Snow has declared no conflicts of interest Quintan Crough has declared no conflicts of interest Cassandre Dion Larivière has declared no conflicts of interest Funmilola Ogunseye has declared no conflicts of interest Joseph Eastwood has declared no conflicts of interest
Figures
References
-
- Ainsworth, J. (2012). The meaning of silence in the right to remain silent. In Solan L. M. & Tiersma P. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law. (pp. 287–298). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0021 - DOI
-
- Berghuis v. Thompkins , 560 U.S. 370 (2010).
-
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
-
- Criminal Justice and Public Order Act (1994). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/33/part/III/crossheading/infer...
-
- Davis, D., & Leo, R. A. (2012). Interrogation through pragmatic implication: Sticking to the letter of the law while violating its intent. In Solan L. M. & Tiersma P. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 354–366). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0026 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources