Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr 12;21(1):e20230089.
doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0089. eCollection 2024.

Gene editing in small and large animals for translational medicine: a review

Affiliations
Review

Gene editing in small and large animals for translational medicine: a review

Clésio Gomes Mariano et al. Anim Reprod. .

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a simpler and more versatile method compared to other engineered nucleases such as Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs) and Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs), and since its discovery, the efficiency of CRISPR-based genome editing has increased to the point that multiple and different types of edits can be made simultaneously. These advances in gene editing have revolutionized biotechnology by enabling precise genome editing with greater simplicity and efficacy than ever before. This tool has been successfully applied to a wide range of animal species, including cattle, pigs, dogs, and other small animals. Engineered nucleases cut the genome at specific target positions, triggering the cell's mechanisms to repair the damage and introduce a mutation to a specific genomic site. This review discusses novel genome-based CRISPR/Cas9 editing tools, methods developed to improve efficiency and specificity, the use of gene-editing on animal models and translational medicine, and the main challenges and limitations of CRISPR-based gene-editing approaches.

Keywords: CRISPR; animal models; gene editing; translational medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic summary of different CRISPR approaches for generation of edited animal models.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic summary of three of the biggest challenges that CRISPR-based technologies face and some strategies to overcome them. Adapted from Rasul et al. (2022).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdolahi S, Ghazvinian Z, Muhammadnejad S, Saleh M, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Baghaei K. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, applications and challenges in cancer research. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03405-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adli M. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1911. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04252-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aird WC. Discovery of the cardiovascular system: from Galen to William Harvey. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(Suppl 1):118–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04312.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albadri S, Del Bene F, Revenu C. Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in approaches in zebrafish. Methods. 2017;121-122:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.03.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amoasii L, Hildyard JC, Li H, Sanchez-Ortiz E, Mireault A, Caballero D, Harron R, Stathopoulou T, Massey C, Shelton JM, Bassel-Duby R, Piercy RJ, Olson EN. Gene editing restores dystrophin expression in a canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Science. 2018;362(6410):86–91. doi: 10.1126/science.aau1549. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources