Thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma: a case-based review with practical guidelines
- PMID: 38630132
- DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05733-9
Thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma: a case-based review with practical guidelines
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant challenge in the context of multiple myeloma, with an incidence of up to 10% in newly diagnosed patients and varying frequency in the relapsed/refractory setting. Accurate VTE risk assessment and personalized thromboprophylaxis strategies are important parts of supportive care in myeloma. There are three validated risk assessment models for prediction of VTE risk in newly diagnosed myeloma-SAVED, IMPEDE-VTE, and PRISM. In this review, we delve into the practical applications of VTE risk prediction models in the context of current therapies. By emphasizing the necessity of a tailored approach, we underscore the importance of considering patient-specific, disease-specific, and treatment-specific risk factors in each clinical scenario, and using that data to complement the output from risk assessment models. We also provide a summary of currently available data on VTE thromboprophylaxis in myeloma, and highlight specific situations where direct oral anticoagulants should be strongly considered. Our objective is to fill the critical gaps in VTE prophylaxis and management through the analysis of specific patient cases and provide a practical overview for clinicians.
Keywords: Multiple myeloma; Risk factors; Thromboprophylaxis; Thrombosis; Venous thromboembolism.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Predicting venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma: development and validation of the IMPEDE VTE score.Am J Hematol. 2019 Nov;94(11):1176-1184. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25603. Epub 2019 Aug 19. Am J Hematol. 2019. PMID: 31379000 Free PMC article.
-
Heparin versus aspirin thromboprophylaxis adds independent value to IMPEDE-VTE score for venous thrombosis prediction in multiple myeloma.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Oct;52(3):848-853. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02407-5. Epub 2021 Mar 1. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021. PMID: 33649980
-
Quality Improvement at an Academic Cancer Center: Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.Cancer Control. 2020 Apr-Jun;27(2):1073274820930204. doi: 10.1177/1073274820930204. Cancer Control. 2020. PMID: 32551873 Free PMC article.
-
Venous thromboembolism risk with contemporary lenalidomide-based regimens despite thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer. 2020 Apr 15;126(8):1640-1650. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32682. Epub 2020 Jan 8. Cancer. 2020. PMID: 31913498 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction and Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism.Oncologist. 2021 Jan;26(1):e2-e7. doi: 10.1002/onco.13569. Epub 2020 Dec 4. Oncologist. 2021. PMID: 33274815 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Development and Validation of a Predictive Nomogram for Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Single-Center Cohort Study in China.Biomedicines. 2025 Mar 21;13(4):770. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13040770. Biomedicines. 2025. PMID: 40299376 Free PMC article.
-
Supportive care in myeloma-when treating the clone alone is not enough.Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2024 Dec 6;2024(1):569-581. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2024000579. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2024. PMID: 39643986 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Fotiou D, Gavriatopoulou M, Terpos E (2020) Multiple myeloma and thrombosis: Prophylaxis and Risk Prediction Tools. Cancers (Basel), 12(1)
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical