Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e245625.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5625.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Use During Pregnancy and Outcomes in Pregnant Individuals and Newborns

Affiliations

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Use During Pregnancy and Outcomes in Pregnant Individuals and Newborns

Paul Gougis et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: With the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), concerns about their pregnancy outcomes through maternal exposure have emerged, and clinical comparative data are lacking.

Objective: To assess the risk of pregnancy-, fetal-, and/or newborn-related adverse outcomes associated with exposure to ICIs compared with exposure to other anticancer agents.

Design, setting, and participants: In this cohort study, all reports mentioning a pregnancy-related condition and an antineoplastic agent (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification group L01) used for a cancer indication registered in the World Health Organization international pharmacovigilance database VigiBase up to June 26, 2022, were extracted.

Exposure: Anticancer agents, including ICIs, used during pregnancy for a cancer indication. Immune checkpoint inhibitors included blockers of programmed cell death 1 (PD1) or its ligand (PD-L1) or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4).

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was the reporting odds ratio (ROR) for maternal, fetal, or newborn complications in patients treated with ICIs vs any other anticancer drug. Adverse events, categorized into 45 individual maternofetal adverse outcomes, were directly mapped to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms in VigiBase.

Results: A total of 3558 reports (ICI: 91 [2.6%]; other anticancer drugs: 3467 [97.4%]) were included in the analysis. In the ICI group, most reports were from the US (60 [65.9%]), and the mean (SD) patient age was 28.9 (10.2) years; in 24 of 55 reports with data on cancer type (43.6%), patients were treated for melanoma. The molecules involved in the ICI group were anti-PD1 (58 reports [63.7%]), anti-PD1 plus anti-CTLA4 (15 [16.5%]), anti-CTLA4 (13 [14.3%]), anti-PD-L1 (4 [4.4%]), and anti-PD1 plus anti-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (1 [1.1%]). An ICI was used in combination with a non-ICI anticancer agent in 10 participants (11.0%). Compared with other anticancer drugs, none of the 45 adverse outcomes identified were overreported in the group exposed to ICIs. However, preterm birth was significantly overreported for the anti-PD1 plus anti-CTLA4 combination compared with other anticancer drugs (12 of 15 [80.0%] vs 793 of 3452 [23.0%]; ROR, 13.87; 95% CI, 3.90-49.28; P < .001) but not for anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA4 monotherapy. Three reports of possibly immune-related maternofetal events were identified: 1 case of maternal antiphospholipid syndrome leading to spontaneous abortion, 1 case of pneumonitis leading to neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and death, and 1 case of transient congenital hypothyroidism.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of 91 individuals exposed to ICIs during pregnancy, ICI exposure was not associated with overreporting of specific adverse pregnancy, fetal, and/or newborn outcomes compared with other anticancer treatments. However, due to possible rare immune-related neonatal adverse events, ICI use in pregnant women should be avoided when possible, especially the anti-PD1 plus anti-CTLA4 combination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Gougis reported receiving grants from Sanofi, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), and nonfinancial support from Eisai outside the submitted work. Dr Cadranel reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Ely Lilly & Company, Janssen, Takeda, Roche, and Pfizer for participation on boards of experts outside the submitted work. Dr Spano reported being a consultant for MSD and Roche; participating in symposia for Eli Lilly & Company, Novartis, Gilead, and Leo Pharma; participating on advisory boards for AstraZeneca and Daichi Sankyo; and receiving grants from MSD Avenir outside the submitted work. Dr Abbar reported receiving grants from MSD Avenir and personal fees from Novartis, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Astellas, and Sanofi outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Study Flowchart
All reports were extracted from VigiBase. Details of data extraction are provided in eTable 1 in Supplement 1. Terms associated secondarily with the VigiBase Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) query terms were not specific to pregnancy and were discarded. Reports also mentioned a suspect or interacting drug from the anatomical and therapeutic chemical classification (ATC) L01 (antineoplastic drugs) that could have been prescribed for a cancer or a noncancer indication. ICI indicates immune checkpoint inhibitor.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Description and Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) of Adverse Pregnancy and Fetal or Newborn Outcomes After Exposure to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) Compared With Exposure to Other Anticancer Drugs
Among the 45 prespecified maternofetal adverse outcome types, the figure shows toxic effects for which at least 1 case was found in the ICI-exposed group (eTable 4 in Supplement 1). Adverse outcomes with n = 1 were deemed not significant. HELLP indicates hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets; HT, hypertension; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; and NOS, not otherwise specified.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Description and Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) of Adverse Pregnancy and Fetal or Newborn Outcomes Associated With Exposure to Each Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Subtype
P values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction (4 analyses). Adverse outcomes with n = 1 were deemed not significant. CTLA4 indicates cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4; HELLP, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets; HT, hypertension; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; NA, not applicable; NOS, not otherwise specified; PD1, programmed cell death 1; and PD-L1, programmed cell death 1 ligand. aP ≤ .001.

Comment in

References

    1. Hepner A, Negrini D, Hase EA, et al. . Cancer during pregnancy: the oncologist overview. World J Oncol. 2019;10(1):28-34. doi:10.14740/wjon1177 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pavlidis NA. Coexistence of pregnancy and malignancy. Oncologist. 2002;7(4):279-287. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2002-0279 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vaddepally RK, Kharel P, Pandey R, Garje R, Chandra AB. Review of indications of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors per NCCN guidelines with the level of evidence. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(3):738. doi:10.3390/cancers12030738 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robert C. A decade of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3801. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17670-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geraud A, Gougis P, Vozy A, et al. . Clinical pharmacology and interplay of immune checkpoint agents: a yin-yang balance. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2021;61:85-112. doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-022820-093805 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances