Reoperation Rates According to Surgical Approach After Operation for Degenerative Cervical Pathology in Patients With Athetoid Cerebral Palsy: A Nationwide Cohort Study
- PMID: 38631333
- PMCID: PMC11572241
- DOI: 10.1177/21925682241247486
Reoperation Rates According to Surgical Approach After Operation for Degenerative Cervical Pathology in Patients With Athetoid Cerebral Palsy: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Abstract
Study design: National population-based cohort study.
Objective: The overall complication rate for patients with athetoid cerebral palsy (CP) undergoing cervical surgery is significantly higher than that of patients without CP. The study was conducted to compare the reoperation and complication rates of anterior fusion, posterior fusion, combined fusion, and laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy/radiculopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy.
Methods: The Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service national database was used for analysis. Data from patients diagnosed with athetoid CP who underwent cervical spine operations for degenerative causes between 2002 and 2020 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into four groups for comparison: anterior fusion, posterior fusion, combined fusion, and laminoplasty.
Results: A total of 672 patients were included in the study. The overall revision rate was 21.0% (141/672). The revision rate was highest in the anterior fusion group (42.7%). The revision rates of combined fusion (11.1%; hazard ratio [HR], .335; P = .002), posterior fusion (13.8%; HR, .533; P = .030) were significantly lower than that of anterior fusion. Revision rate of laminoplasty (13.1%; HR, .541; P = .240) was also lower than anterior fusion although the result did not demonstrate statistical significance.
Conclusion: Anterior fusion presented the highest reoperation risk after cervical spine surgery reaching 42.7% in patients with athetoid CP. Therefore, anterior-only fusion in patients with athetoid CP should be avoided or reserved for strictly selected patients. Combined fusion, with the lowest revision risk at 11.1%, could be safely applied to patients with athetoid CP.
Keywords: anterior fusion; athetoid cerebral palsy; cervical spine surgery; combined fusion; laminoplasty; national cohort study; posterior fusion; revision operation.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Oct;32(7):1283-1289. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03109-7. Epub 2021 Aug 29. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022. PMID: 34455477
-
Reoperation Rates After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease According to Different Surgical Procedures: National Population-based Cohort Study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Oct 1;41(19):1484-1492. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001581. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016. PMID: 27031768
-
Long-term results of operative treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy: an over 10-year follow-up study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 May 1;27(9):943-8; discussion 948. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200205010-00011. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002. PMID: 11979166
-
Revision surgery after cervical laminoplasty: report of five cases and literature review.Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):e7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.048. Epub 2013 Dec 10. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 24333456 Review.
-
C5 nerve root palsy following decompression of cervical spine with anterior versus posterior types of procedures in patients with cervical myelopathy.Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2050-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4567-4. Epub 2016 Apr 19. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 27095700 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous