Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 10;42(13):3206-3214.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.005. Epub 2024 Apr 16.

Understanding the views of adult migrants around catch-up vaccination for missed routine immunisations to define strategies to improve coverage: A UK in-depth interview study

Affiliations

Understanding the views of adult migrants around catch-up vaccination for missed routine immunisations to define strategies to improve coverage: A UK in-depth interview study

Anna Deal et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization's (WHO) Immunization Agenda 2030 emphasises ensuring equitable access to vaccination across the life course. This includes placing an emphasis on migrant populations who may have missed key childhood vaccines, doses, and boosters due to disrupted healthcare systems and the migration process, or differing vaccination schedules in home countries. Guidelines exist in the UK for offering catch-up vaccinations to adolscent and adult migrants with incomplete or uncertain vaccination status (including MMR, Td-IPV, MenACWY, HPV), but emerging evidence suggests awareness and implementation in primary care is poor. It is unclear whether patient-level barriers to uptake of catch-up vaccinations also exist. We explored experiences and views around catch-up vaccination among adult migrants from a range of backgrounds, to define strategies for improving catch-up vaccination policy and practice.

Methods: In-depth semi-structured interviews were carried out in two phases with adult migrant populations (refugees, asylum seekers, undocumented migrants, those with no recourse to public funds) on views and experiences around vaccination, involving a team of peer researchers from specific migrant communities trained through the study. In Phase 1, we conducted remote interviews with migrants resident in the UK for < 10 years, from diverse backgrounds. In Phase 2, we engaged specifically Congolese and Angolan migrants as part of a community-based participatory study. Topic guides were developed iteratively and piloted. Participants were recruited using purposive, opportunistic and snowball sampling methods. Interviews were conducted in English (interpreters offered), Lingala or French and were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework approach in NVivo 12.

Results: 71 participants (39 in Phase 1, 32 in Phase 2) were interviewed (Mean age 43.6 [SD:12.4] years, 69% female, mean 9.5 [SD:7] years in the UK). Aside from COVID-19 vaccines, most participants reported never having been offered vaccinations or asked about their vaccination history since arriving in the UK as adults. Few participants mentioned being offered specific catch-up vaccines (e.g. MMR/Td-IPV) when attending a healthcare facility on arrival in the UK. Vaccines such as flu vaccines, pregnancy-related or pre-travel vaccination were more commonly mentioned. In general, participants were not aware of adult catch-up vaccination but regarded it positively when it was explained. A few participants expressed concerns about side-effects, risks/inconveniences associated with access (e.g. links to immigration authorities, travel costs), preference for natural remedies, and hesitancy to engage in further vaccination campaigns due to the intensity of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. Trust was a major factor in vaccination decisions, with distinctions noted within and between groups; some held a healthcare professional's recommendation in high regard, while others were less trusting towards the healthcare system because of negative experiences of the NHS and past experiences of discrimination, injustice and marginalisation by wider authorities.

Conclusions: The major barrier to adult catch-up vaccination for missed routine immunisations and doses in migrant communities in the UK is the limited opportunities, recommendations or tailored vaccination information presented to migrants by health services. This could be improved with financial incentives for provision of catch-up vaccination in UK primary care, alongside training of healthcare professionals to support catch-up immunisation and raise awareness of existing guidelines. It will also be essential to address root causes of mistrust around vaccination, where it exists among migrants, by working closely with communities to understand their needs and meaningfully involving migrant populations in co-producing tailored information campaigns and culturally relevant interventions to improve coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Sally Hargreaves, Alison Crawshaw reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Health Research (NIHR). Anna Deal, Sally Hayward reports financial support was provided by UKRI Medical Research Council. Sally Hargreaves reports financial support was provided by Academy of Medical Sciences. Sandra Mounier-Jack reports financial support was provided by National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation. Azeem Majeed reports financial support was provided by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration NW London. Azeem Majeed reports financial support was provided by NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. Oumnia Bouaddi reports financial support was provided by La Caixa.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Catch-up vaccination schedule for those over 10 years old with unknown or uncertain immunisation status in the UK, reproduced from , .
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relative frequencies of participants reporting they had received specific vaccinations since arriving in the UK.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Deal A., Halliday R., Crawshaw A., Hayward S., Burnard A., Rustage K., et al. Migration and outbreaks of vaccine-preventable disease in Europe: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(12):E387–E398. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation . WHO; Geneva: 2022. Ensuring the integration of refugees and migrants in immunization policies, planning and service delivery globally. - PubMed
    1. Bell S., Saliba V., Ramsay M., Mounier-Jack S. What have we learnt from measles outbreaks in 3 English cities? A qualitative exploration of factors influencing vaccination uptake in Romanian and Roma Romanian communities. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ECDC. Measles cases in the EU treble in 2017, outbreaks still ongoing [press release]. . Stockholm: ECDC; 9th February 2018.
    1. Jones G, Haeghebaert S, Merlin B, Antona D, Simon N, Elmouden M, et al. Measles outbreak in a refugee settlement in Calais, France: January to February 2016. Eurosurveillance. 2016;21(11):30167-. - PubMed

Publication types