Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 17;24(1):348.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04939-w.

Conditional survival and annual hazard of death in older patients with esophageal cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy

Affiliations

Conditional survival and annual hazard of death in older patients with esophageal cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy

Xiao Chang et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Definitive chemoradiotherapy is one of the primary treatment modalities for older patients with esophageal cancer (EC). However, the evolution of prognosis over time and the factors affected non-EC deaths remain inadequately studied. We examined the conditional survival and annual hazard of death in older patients with EC after chemoradiotherapy.

Methods: We collected data from patients aged 65 or older with EC registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database during 2000-2019. Conditional survival was defined as the probability of survival given a specific time survived. Annual hazard of death was defined the yearly event rate. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis identified the association of age at diagnosis with mortality.

Results: Among 3739 patients, the 3-year conditional overall survival increased annually by 7-10%. Non-EC causes accounted for 18.8% of deaths, predominantly due to cardio-cerebrovascular diseases. The hazard of death decreased from 40 to 10% in the first 6 years and then gradually increased to 20% in the tenth year. Non-EC causes surpassed EC causes in hazard starting 5 years post-treatment. RCS indicated a consistent increase in death hazard with advancing age, following a linear relationship. The overall cohort was divided into two groups: 65-74 and ≥ 75 years old, with the ≥ 75-year-old group showing poorer survival and earlier onset of non-EC deaths (HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.15-1.62, P < 0.001). Patients with early-stage disease (I-II) had higher risks of death from non-EC causes (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.98, P = 0.035). Tumor histology had no significant impact on non-EC death risk (HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.98-1.39, P = 0.081).

Conclusions: Survival probability increases with time for older patients with EC treated with chemoradiotherapy. Clinicians and patients should prioritize managing and preventing age-related comorbidities, especially in older cohorts and those with early-stage disease.

Keywords: Conditional survival; Death hazard; Esophageal cancer; Older.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram showing study sample selection process. SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) Conditional overall survival (OS) curves as a function of the number of years survived since treatment. (B) Conditional cancer-specific survival (CSS) curves as a function of the number of years of cancer-specific survival since treatment. The colors of the lines are assigned in the order of years survived or cancer-specific survival since treatment, from years 0 to 5. (C) Three-year conditional survival probability as a function of the number of years survived or cancer-specific survival since treatment. (D) Smoothed hazard plots for annual rates of death from all causes, death from EC, and death from non-EC causes by time after treatment. OS, overall survival; CSS, cancer-specific survival; EC, esophageal cancer
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The restricted cubic spline plot for the association of age at diagnosis and hazard of death from all causes (A), EC cause (B), and non-EC causes (C). EC, esophageal cancer
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Smoothed hazard plots for annual rate of death from all causes, death from EC, and death from non-EC causes by time after treatment, stratified by the age (A- B), histology (C- D), and stage (E- F). EC, esophageal cancer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balducci L, Ershler WB. Cancer and ageing: a nexus at several levels. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:655–62. doi: 10.1038/nrc1675. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edwards, Howe, Ries, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1999, featuring implications of age and aging on U.S. cancer burden. Cancer. 2002;94:2766–92. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10593. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith BD, Smith GL, Hurria A, et al. Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2758–65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8983. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mantziari S, Farinha HT, Bouygues V et al. Esophageal cancer in elderly patients, current treatment options and outcomes; a systematic review and pooled analysis. Cancers (Basel); 13. Epub ahead of print 2021. 10.3390/cancers13092104. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herskovic A, Martz K, Al-Sarraf M, et al. Combined chemotherapy and Radiotherapy compared with Radiotherapy alone in patients with Cancer of the Esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1593–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199206113262403. - DOI - PubMed