Serum N-glycomic profiling identifies candidate biomarker panels for assessing coronary artery stenosis severity
- PMID: 38633623
- PMCID: PMC11021961
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29443
Serum N-glycomic profiling identifies candidate biomarker panels for assessing coronary artery stenosis severity
Abstract
Stenosis severity may escalate over the course of coronary artery disease (CAD), increasing the risk of death for the patient. Conventionally, the assessment of stenosis degree relies on invasive coronary angiography (ICA), an invasive examination unsuitable for patients in poor physical condition or those with contrast allergies and one that imposes a psychological burden on patients. Although abnormal serum N-glycan profiles have exhibited robust associations with various cardiovascular diseases, including CAD, their potential in diagnosing CAD stenosis remains to be determined. In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of serum N-glycome from 132 patients who underwent ICA and 27 healthy controls using MALDI-TOF-mass spectrometry. The patients who underwent ICA examination were categorized into four groups based on stenosis severity: no/mild/moderate/severe stenosis. Twenty-seven N-glycans were directly quantified, and 47 derived glycan traits were obtained. Notably, among these 74 glycan features, 18 exhibited variations across the study groups. Using a combination of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and logistic regression analyses, we developed five diagnostic models for recognizing stenosis degree. Our results suggested that alterations in serum N-glycosylation modifications might be valuable for identifying stenosis degree and monitoring disease progression in individuals with CAD. It is expected to offer a noninvasive alternative for those who could not undergo ICA because of various reasons. However, the diagnostic potential of serum N-glycan panels as biomarkers requires multicenter, large cohort validation in the future.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Coronary artery stenosis; Mass spectrometry; N-glycomic profiling.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 13;60(20):2103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.062. Epub 2012 Oct 17. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 23083780
-
Impact of machine-learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve on decision-making in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep;32(9):6008-6016. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08758-8. Epub 2022 Apr 1. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35359166
-
Detecting lesion-specific ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease with computed tomography fractional flow reserve measured at different sites.BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Jun 6;23(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01031-4. BMC Med Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37277697 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship of coronary artery plaque composition to coronary artery stenosis severity: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY trial.Atherosclerosis. 2011 Dec;219(2):573-8. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.05.032. Epub 2011 May 31. Atherosclerosis. 2011. PMID: 21696739 Clinical Trial.
-
Can Computed Fractional Flow Reserve Coronary CT Angiography (FFRCT) Offer an Accurate Noninvasive Comparison to Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA)? "The Noninvasive CATH." A Comprehensive Review.Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021 Mar;46(3):100642. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100642. Epub 2020 Jun 3. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 32624193 Review.
References
-
- Freeman A.M., Raman S.V., Aggarwal M., Maron D.J., Bhatt D.L., Parwani P., Osborne J., Earls J.P., Min J.K., Bax J.J., Shapiro M.D. Integrating coronary atherosclerosis burden and progression with coronary artery disease risk factors to guide therapeutic decision making[J] Am. J. Med. 2023;136(3):260–269. - PubMed
-
- Gaudio L.T., Veltri P., De Rosa S., Indolfi C., Fragomeni G. Model and application to support the coronary artery diseases (CAD): development and testing[J] Interdiscipl. Sci. Comput. Life Sci. 2020;12(1):50–58. - PubMed
-
- Zhou M., Wang H., Zeng X., Yin P., Zhu J., Chen W., Li X., Wang L., Wang L., Liu Y., Liu J., Zhang M., Qi J., Yu S., Afshin A., Gakidou E., Glenn S., Krish V.S., Miller-Petrie M.K., Mountjoy-Venning W.C., Mullany E.C., Redford S.B., Liu H., Naghavi M., Hay S.I., Wang L., Murray C.J.L., Liang X. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J] Lancet. 2019;394(10204):1145–1158. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Abensur Vuillaume L., Gentilhomme C., Weber S., Ouamara N., Bayard J., Valla M., Khalife K., Goetz C., Guler N. Effectiveness of hypnosis for the prevention of anxiety during coronary angiography (HYPCOR study): a prospective randomized study[J] BMC Compl. Alternative Med. 2022;22(1):315. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chorianopoulos E. Current value of diagnostic coronary angiography[J] Zeitschrift fur Herz Thorax und Gefasschirurgie. 2018;32(5):361–371.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous