Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 9;10(7):e29443.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29443. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.

Serum N-glycomic profiling identifies candidate biomarker panels for assessing coronary artery stenosis severity

Affiliations

Serum N-glycomic profiling identifies candidate biomarker panels for assessing coronary artery stenosis severity

Linlin Wu et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Stenosis severity may escalate over the course of coronary artery disease (CAD), increasing the risk of death for the patient. Conventionally, the assessment of stenosis degree relies on invasive coronary angiography (ICA), an invasive examination unsuitable for patients in poor physical condition or those with contrast allergies and one that imposes a psychological burden on patients. Although abnormal serum N-glycan profiles have exhibited robust associations with various cardiovascular diseases, including CAD, their potential in diagnosing CAD stenosis remains to be determined. In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of serum N-glycome from 132 patients who underwent ICA and 27 healthy controls using MALDI-TOF-mass spectrometry. The patients who underwent ICA examination were categorized into four groups based on stenosis severity: no/mild/moderate/severe stenosis. Twenty-seven N-glycans were directly quantified, and 47 derived glycan traits were obtained. Notably, among these 74 glycan features, 18 exhibited variations across the study groups. Using a combination of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and logistic regression analyses, we developed five diagnostic models for recognizing stenosis degree. Our results suggested that alterations in serum N-glycosylation modifications might be valuable for identifying stenosis degree and monitoring disease progression in individuals with CAD. It is expected to offer a noninvasive alternative for those who could not undergo ICA because of various reasons. However, the diagnostic potential of serum N-glycan panels as biomarkers requires multicenter, large cohort validation in the future.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Coronary artery stenosis; Mass spectrometry; N-glycomic profiling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Workflow of serum N-glycan profiling.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative MALDI-TOF MS spectra showing the composition of serum N-glycans.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Violin plots of altered serum N-glycan profiles among the H1, 0-CAD (no stenosis), 1-CAD (mild stenosis), 2-CAD (moderate stenosis), and 3-CAD (severe stenosis) groups. * indicates p-value <0.05, ** indicates p-value <0.01, *** indicates p-value <0.001, **** indicates p-value <0.0001.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The recognition ability of N-glycome analysis for cases with or without coronary artery stenosis. (A) LASSO coefficient profile plot of the 18 differential glycan features against the log (lambda) sequence. (B) Penalty parameter (lambda) selection by LASSO adopted 10-fold cross-validation. (C) Forest plot of the logistic regression model. (D) Nomogram of the logistic regression model. (E) The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of the nomogram with 95% confidence intervals of the area under the curve (AUC).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of coronary artery stenosis diagnostic models. 0-CAD indicates no stenosis, 1-CAD indicates mild stenosis, 2-CAD indicates moderate stenosis, and 3-CAD indicates severe stenosis.

Similar articles

References

    1. Freeman A.M., Raman S.V., Aggarwal M., Maron D.J., Bhatt D.L., Parwani P., Osborne J., Earls J.P., Min J.K., Bax J.J., Shapiro M.D. Integrating coronary atherosclerosis burden and progression with coronary artery disease risk factors to guide therapeutic decision making[J] Am. J. Med. 2023;136(3):260–269. - PubMed
    1. Gaudio L.T., Veltri P., De Rosa S., Indolfi C., Fragomeni G. Model and application to support the coronary artery diseases (CAD): development and testing[J] Interdiscipl. Sci. Comput. Life Sci. 2020;12(1):50–58. - PubMed
    1. Zhou M., Wang H., Zeng X., Yin P., Zhu J., Chen W., Li X., Wang L., Wang L., Liu Y., Liu J., Zhang M., Qi J., Yu S., Afshin A., Gakidou E., Glenn S., Krish V.S., Miller-Petrie M.K., Mountjoy-Venning W.C., Mullany E.C., Redford S.B., Liu H., Naghavi M., Hay S.I., Wang L., Murray C.J.L., Liang X. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J] Lancet. 2019;394(10204):1145–1158. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abensur Vuillaume L., Gentilhomme C., Weber S., Ouamara N., Bayard J., Valla M., Khalife K., Goetz C., Guler N. Effectiveness of hypnosis for the prevention of anxiety during coronary angiography (HYPCOR study): a prospective randomized study[J] BMC Compl. Alternative Med. 2022;22(1):315. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chorianopoulos E. Current value of diagnostic coronary angiography[J] Zeitschrift fur Herz Thorax und Gefasschirurgie. 2018;32(5):361–371.

LinkOut - more resources