Diagnostic yield from symptomatic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in the UK: A British Society of Gastroenterology analysis using data from the National Endoscopy Database
- PMID: 38634291
- DOI: 10.1111/apt.18003
Diagnostic yield from symptomatic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in the UK: A British Society of Gastroenterology analysis using data from the National Endoscopy Database
Abstract
Background: The value of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy (LGIE; colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy) relates to its ability to detect clinically relevant findings, predominantly cancers, preneoplastic polyps or inflammatory bowel disease. There are concerns that many LGIEs are performed on low-risk patients with limited benefit.
Aims: To determine the diagnostic outcomes of LGIE for common symptoms.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of diagnostic LGIE between March 2019 and February 2020 using the UK National Endoscopy Database. We used mixed-effects logistic regression models, incorporating random (endoscopist) and fixed (symptoms, patient age, and sex) effects upon two dependent variables (large polyp [≥10 mm] and cancer diagnosis). Adjusted positive predictive values (aPPVs) were calculated.
Results: We analysed 384,510 LGIEs; 33.2% were performed on patients aged under 50 and 53.6% on women. Regarding colonoscopies, the unadjusted PPV for cancer was 1.5% (95% CI: 1.4-1.5); higher for men than women (1.9% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01). The PPV for large polyps was 3.2% (95% CI: 3.1-3.2). The highest colonoscopy cancer aPPVs were in the over 50s (1.9%) and in those with rectal bleeding (2.5%) or anaemia (2.1%). Cancer aPPVs for other symptoms were <1% despite representing 54.3% of activity. In patients under 50, aPPVs were 0.4% for cancer and 1.6% for large polyps. Results were similar for sigmoidoscopy.
Conclusions: Most colonoscopies were performed on patients with low-risk symptoms, where cancer risk was similar to the general population. Cancer and large polyp yield was highest in elderly patients with rectal bleeding or anaemia, although still fell short of FIT-based screening yields.
Keywords: colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; diagnostic yield; flexible sigmoidoscopy; population health.
© 2024 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Editorial: Making lower GI endoscopy referrals more FIT for purpose.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jul;60(2):274-275. doi: 10.1111/apt.18038. Epub 2024 May 16. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024. PMID: 38757447 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- NHS‐Digital, Urgent suspected cancer referrals. Referral, conversion and detection rates, April 2009 to March 2021, N.D.R. Service, Editor. 2021, NHS Digital. https://www.cancerdata.nhs.uk/cwt_conversion_and_detection.
-
- Ravindran S, Bassett P, Shaw T, Dron M, Broughton R, Johnston D, et al. National census of UK endoscopy services in 2019. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020;12:451–460.
-
- Breslin NP. Gastric cancer and other endoscopic diagnoses in patients with benign dyspepsia. Gut. 2000;46(1):93–97.
-
- Halasz JB, Burak KW, Dowling SK, Murray B, Williams J, Misra T, et al. Do low‐risk patients with dyspepsia need a gastroscopy? Use of gastroscopy for otherwise healthy patients with dyspepsia. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022;5(1):32–38.
-
- Maurice JB, Siau K, Sebastian S, Ahuja N, Wesley E, Stableforth W, et al. Green endoscopy: a call for sustainability in the midst of COVID‐19. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(7):636–638.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical