Labiaplasty Outcomes and Complications in Turkish Women: A Multicentric Study
- PMID: 38635038
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05777-5
Labiaplasty Outcomes and Complications in Turkish Women: A Multicentric Study
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes, complication rates, and complication types of different labiaplasty techniques.
Methods: In this cross-sectional retrospective study, a total of 2,594 patients who underwent surgery owing to hypertrophy or asymmetry of the labium minus were retrospectively analyzed. Data were collected by individual interviews with 43 experts from different centers. The patients were between 18 and 50 years of age. During the interview information about the presence and nature of complications, and about concomitant or revision surgeries, were gathered. The surgeons who performed these surgeries were also questioned about their training and surgical experience.
Results: The most frequently observed complication was complete dehiscence, accounting for 29% of all complications. Complete dehiscence was most commonly seen after wedge resection (16 cases). The second most common complication was labium majus hematoma, accounting for 12.5% of all cases. Among the labiaplasty techniques, wedge resection had the highest complication rate at 3% (26 cases out of 753 patients). This was followed by composite labiaplasty at 1.2% (5 cases out of 395 patients), Z-plasty at 0.8% (1 case out of 123 patients), and trimming labiaplasty at 0.5% (7 cases out of 1,323 patients).
Conclusion: Considering the heterogeneity and low quality of the existing studies on this subject, this study provides valuable information for surgeons practicing in this field. However, further research is clearly warranted as female genital aesthetic procedures are being performed with a steadily increasing trend.
Keywords: Asymmetry; Complications; Cosmetic surgery; Labial hypertrophy; Labiaplasty.
© 2024. The International Urogynecological Association.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes, Techniques, and Risk Factors for Dehiscence in Central Wedge Labiaplasty.Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Jul;85(S1 Suppl 1):S68-S75. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002342. Ann Plast Surg. 2020. PMID: 32530849
-
'Botched labiaplasty': a content analysis of online advertising for revision labiaplasty.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Oct;40(7):1000-1005. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1679732. Epub 2019 Dec 12. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020. PMID: 31826680
-
Posterior wedge resection: a more aesthetic labiaplasty.Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Aug 1;33(6):847-53. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13494755. Epub 2013 Jun 27. Aesthet Surg J. 2013. PMID: 23812954
-
Labia minora reduction techniques: a comprehensive literature review.Aesthet Surg J. 2015 May;35(4):419-31. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv023. Aesthet Surg J. 2015. PMID: 25908699 Review.
-
Cosmetic Labiaplasty in an Adolescent Population.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Jun;29(3):218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Oct 8. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26453828 Review.
References
-
- Kalaaji A, Dreyer S, Maric I, Schnegg J, Jönsson V. Female cosmetic genital surgery: patient characteristics, motivation, and satisfaction. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(12):1455–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy309 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aesthetic Plastic Surgery National Databank Statistics 2020–2021. Aesthet Surg J. 2022;42(Suppl 1):1–18.
-
- Lista F, Mistry BD, Yashoda S, et al. The safety of aesthetic labiaplasty: a plastic surgery experience. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;6:689–95. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical