Preventive strategies to reduce the rate of periprosthetic infections in total joint arthroplasty; a comprehensive review
- PMID: 38635048
- PMCID: PMC11602800
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05301-w
Preventive strategies to reduce the rate of periprosthetic infections in total joint arthroplasty; a comprehensive review
Abstract
The increasing frequency of total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasties (TKA) is marred by the rise in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and surgical site infections (SSIs), with PJIs incurring costs over $1.62 billion as of 2020 and individual case management averaging $90,000. SSIs additionally burden the U.S. healthcare economy with billions in expenses annually. PJI prevalence in primary THA and TKA ranges from 0.5% to 2.4%, spiking to 20% in revisions and representing 25% of TKA revision causes. Projections estimate up to 270,000 annual PJI cases by 2030. Often caused by gram-positive bacteria, particularly methicillin-resistant staphylococci, these infections demand preventive measures. This review dissects PJI prevention across preoperative, intraoperative, and perioperative phases, aligning with evidence-based CDC and WHO guidelines. Preoperative measures include managing diabetes, obesity, tobacco use, Staphylococcus aureus screening and nasal decolonization, nutritional optimization, and management of inflammatory arthropathies. Intraoperatively, antibiotic prophylaxis, skin preparation, operative room environmental controls, surgical technique precision, and irrigation options are scrutinized. Perioperative concerns focus on anticoagulation, blood management, and infection risk mitigation. Integrating these strategies promotes a patient-centric care model, aiming to reduce PJI incidence, improve patient outcomes, and increase care cost-effectiveness in joint arthroplasty.
Keywords: Periprosthetic joint infections; Prevention; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Can nasal Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization prior to elective total joint arthroplasty reduce surgical site and prosthesis-related infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 19;15(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01601-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 32075670 Free PMC article.
-
2019 John Charnley Award: Increased risk of prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee and hip arthroplasty with the use of alternative antibiotics to cefazolin: the value of allergy testing for antibiotic prophylaxis.Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6_Supple_B):9-15. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1407.R1. Bone Joint J. 2019. PMID: 31146571
-
Early Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Microorganisms, Mortality, and Implant Survival Using a Combined Dataset From the Dutch Arthroplasty Register and the Dutch National Nosocomial Surveillance Network.J Arthroplasty. 2025 Jan;40(1):208-213.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.019. Epub 2024 Jul 16. J Arthroplasty. 2025. PMID: 39025275
-
Twenty Percent of Patients May Remain Colonized With Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Despite a Decolonization Protocol in Patients Undergoing Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jul;473(7):2283-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4191-3. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25690169 Free PMC article.
-
The application of topical vancomycin powder for the prevention of surgical site infections in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Jun;107(4):102741. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Nov 27. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 33257290 Review.
Cited by
-
Temporal Patterns and Treatment Associations in Complications Following Hip Arthroplasty.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 23;15(7):815. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070815. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40218165 Free PMC article.
-
The Efficacy of Defensive Antibacterial Coating (DAC™) Periprosthetic Joint Infection Prevention in the Hip: A Systematic Review.J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 5;14(1):270. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010270. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 39797352 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Short-stem THA-complications and therapy options].Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Jul;54(7):530-536. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04663-2. Epub 2025 Jun 5. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025. PMID: 40473831 Free PMC article. German.
References
-
- Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, Schmier JK, Parvizi J (2012) Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty 27(8 Suppl):61-65.e1. 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.022 - PubMed
-
- Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785. 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222 - PubMed
-
- Wang FD, Wang YP, Chen CF, Chen HP (2018) The incidence rate, trend and microbiological aetiology of prosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty: A 13 years’ experience from a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 51(6):717–722. 10.1016/j.jmii.2018.08.011 - PubMed
-
- Boddapati V, Fu MC, Mayman DJ, Su EP, Sculco PK, McLawhorn AS (2018) Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With Increased Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Relative to Noninfectious Revisions. J Arthroplasty 33(2):521–526. 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.021 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical