Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;40(8):2287-2294.
doi: 10.1007/s00381-024-06391-y. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

Anatomical features of the sphenoid ridge in the pediatric population

Affiliations

Anatomical features of the sphenoid ridge in the pediatric population

Baran Can Alpergin et al. Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the relation of the sphenoid ridge (SR) with the surrounding anatomical structures in healthy children when approaching the anterior and middle fossae.

Methods: Computed tomography of 180 pediatric patients (90 males / 90 females), aged 1-18 years were included the study. The size of the lesser wing (LW) and the distances of the LW to certain landmarks were measured.

Results: The LW length was 28.48 ± 8.15 mm. The LW widths at the midline and the midpoint and lateral point of the SR were 7.78 ± 1.74 mm, 2.84 ± 0.81 mm, and 1.91 ± 0.64 mm, respectively. The distance between the midpoint of the SR and the crista galli was 28.22 ± 5.56 mm, and the distance between the crista alaris and internal auditory meatus was 51.73 ± 5.79 mm. The linear function was calculated as y = 18.748 + 1.024 × age for SR length, y = 6.046 + 0.182 × age for the midline width of SR, y = 2.367 + 0.050 × age for the midpoint width of SR, y = 1.249 + 0.069 × age for the crista alaris width, y = 21.727 + 0.683 × age for the distance between the SR midpoint and the crista galli, and y = 43.614 + 0.855 × age for the distance between the crista alaris and internal auditory meatus.

Conclusion: All measured parameters increased irregularly with advancing age. Furthermore, our regression equations representing the growth dynamics of SR may be used to estimate these parameters.

Keywords: Children; Computed tomography; Lesser wing; Sphenoid bone.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Oakes WJ (2007) Quantitation of and measurements utilizing the sphenoid ridge. Clin Anat 20(2):131–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20255 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guinto G, Abello J, Félix I, González J, Oviedo A (1997) Lesions confined to the sphenoid ridge: differential diagnosis and surgical treatment. Skull Base Surg 7(3):115–121. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1058602 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. MacCarty CS (1972) Meningiomas of the sphenoidal ridge. J Neurosurg 36:114–120. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1972.36.1.0114 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nathal E, Gomez-Amador JL (2005) Anatomic and surgical basis of the sphenoid ridge keyhole approach for cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 56(1 Suppl):178–185. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000145967.66852.96 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kahilogullari G, Uz A, Eroglu U, Apaydin N, Yesilirmak Z, Baskaya MK, Egemen N (2012) Does the sphenoid angle effect the operation strategy? Anatomical and radiological investigation. Turk Neurosurg 22(5):618–623. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.5790-12.0 - DOI - PubMed