Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Jun 1;150(6):492-499.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.0103.

Reconstruction for Salvage Laryngectomy With Limited Pharyngectomy

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Reconstruction for Salvage Laryngectomy With Limited Pharyngectomy

Mauricio A Moreno et al. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Closure technique for optimization of postoperative and functional outcomes following salvage laryngectomy remains an area of debate among head and neck surgeons.

Objective: To investigate the association of salvage laryngectomy closure technique with early postoperative and functional outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients from 17 academic, tertiary care centers who underwent total laryngectomy with no or limited pharyngectomy after completing a course of definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2016. Patients with defects not amenable to primary closure were excluded. Data were analyzed from February 14, 2021, to January 29, 2024.

Exposures: Total laryngectomy with and without limited pharyngectomy, reconstructed by primary mucosal closure (PC), regional closure (RC), or free tissue transfer (FTT).

Main outcomes and measures: Patients were stratified on the basis of the pharyngeal closure technique. Perioperative and long-term functional outcomes were evaluated with bivariate analyses. A multivariable regression model adjusted for historical risk factors for pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) was used to assess risk associated with closure technique. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were determined.

Results: The study included 309 patients (256 [82.8%] male; mean age, 64.7 [range, 58.0-72.0] years). Defects were reconstructed as follows: FTT (161 patients [52.1%]), RC (64 [20.7%]), and PC (84 [27.2%]). A PCF was noted in 36 of 161 patients in the FTT group (22.4%), 25 of 64 in the RC group (39.1%), and 29 of 84 in the PC group (34.5%). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing PC or RC had a higher risk of PCF compared with those undergoing FTT (PC: RR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.1-4.4]; RC: RR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.3-4.8]). Undergoing FTT was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in risk of PCF (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; number needed to treat, 7). Subgroup analysis comparing inset techniques for the RC group showed a higher risk of PCF associated with PC (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0) and predominately pectoralis myofascial flap with onlay technique (RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.2), but there was no association of pectoralis myocutaneous flap with cutaneous paddle interposition with PCF (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-2.8) compared with FTT with cutaneous inset. There were no clinically significant differences in functional outcomes between the groups.

Conclusion and relevance: In this study of patients with limited pharyngeal defects, interpositional fasciocutaneous closure technique was associated with reduced risk of PCF in the salvage setting, which is most commonly achieved by FTT in academic practices. Closure technique was not associated with functional outcomes at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Graboyes reported receiving grants from the National Cancer Institute, the Triologic Society/American College of Surgeons, and Castle Biosciences and personal fees from the National Cancer Institute and Castle Biosciences outside the submitted work and serving on the editorial board of JAMA Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery. Dr Ghanem reported receiving grants from and serving on the advisory board for Axogen Inc outside the submitted work. Dr Jackson reported receiving honoraria from Intuitive outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Relative Risks (RRs) and 95% CIs From a Multivariable Logistic Model With Generalized Estimating Equations
FTT indicates free tissue transfer; IFFF, interpositional fasciocutaneous free flap; PC, primary mucosal closure; PCF, pharyngocutaneous fistula; PMMC, pectoralis myocutaneous flap with cutaneous paddle interposition; PMMF, predominately pectoralis myofascial flap with onlay technique; and RC, regional closure.

Comment in

References

    1. Meulemans J, Demarsin H, Debacker J, et al. . Functional outcomes and complications after salvage total laryngectomy for residual, recurrent, and second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1390. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.01390 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fung K, Lyden TH, Lee J, et al. . Voice and swallowing outcomes of an organ-preservation trial for advanced laryngeal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63(5):1395-1399. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boscolo-Rizzo P, Maronato F, Marchiori C, Gava A, Da Mosto MC. Long-term quality of life after total laryngectomy and postoperative radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for laryngeal preservation. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(2):300-306. doi:10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815a9ed3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oridate N, Homma A, Suzuki S, et al. . Voice-related quality of life after treatment of laryngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(4):363-368. doi:10.1001/archoto.2009.8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lambert L, Fortin B, Soulières D, et al. . Organ preservation with concurrent chemoradiation for advanced laryngeal cancer: are we succeeding? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(2):398-402. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.058 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types