Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0299282.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299282. eCollection 2024.

Time spent at health facility is a key driver of patient satisfaction, but did not influence retention to HIV care: A serial cross-sectional study in Mozambique

Affiliations

Time spent at health facility is a key driver of patient satisfaction, but did not influence retention to HIV care: A serial cross-sectional study in Mozambique

Caroline De Schacht et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Patient satisfaction with clinical services can have an effect on retention in HIV care and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. This study assessed patient satisfaction and its association with retention and viral suppression in Zambézia Province, Mozambique.

Methods: Monthly exit interviews with persons living with HIV were completed from August 2017-January 2019 in 20 health facilities; clinical data were extracted from medical records. Regression analyses assessed the effect of satisfaction scores on retention and viral suppression, adjusting for age, sex, education, civil status, time on treatment, and site. Satisfaction scores were correlated with time spent at health facilities using generalized linear regression models.

Results: Data from 4388 patients were analyzed. Overall median satisfaction score was 75% (IQR 53%-84%); median time spent at facilities (from arrival until completion of clinical services) was 2h54min (IQR 1h48min-4h). Overall satisfaction score was not associated with higher odds of retention or viral suppression, but association was seen between satisfaction regarding attention given to patient and respect and higher odds of viral suppression. Patient satisfaction was negatively associated with time spent in facility (Spearman's correlation -0.63). Increased time spent at facility (from 1 to 3 hours) was not associated with lower retention in care (OR 0.72 [95%CI:0.52-1.01] and 0.83 [95%CI: 0.63-1.09] at 6- and 12-months, respectively), nor with a lower odds of viral suppression (OR 0.96 [95%CI: 0.71-1.32]).

Conclusions: Strategies to reduce patient wait times at the health facility warrant continued prioritization. Differentiated models of care have helped considerably, but novel approaches are still needed to further decongest crowded health facilities. In addition, a good client-provider communication and positive attitude can improve patient satisfaction with health services, with an overall improved retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study locations (n = 20) (green = rural; dark blue = urban).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Satisfaction score per individual question (n = 4,388).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Boxplots by study period, showing the variation of patient satisfaction scores over time.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Effect of patient satisfaction score (A) and time spent in health facility (B) on the log-odds of being retained in care at 6 months (left), 12 months (middle) and the log-odds of viral suppression (right).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Effect of patient satisfaction score on viral suppression, 6- and 12-month retention; adjusted regression analysis.
Fig 6
Fig 6
Patient satisfaction scores by time spent in health facility, overall (a) and per district (b). Lines correspond to the predicted values obtained from the ordinal regression, in which study period was modelled via restricted cubic splines, with three knots place at the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles. Time spent: short (< 2.5 hours), medium (between 2.5 and 5 hours), and long (> 5 hours).

References

    1. UNAIDS. UNAIDS Core Epeidemiology Slides 2021. Geneva2022 [Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2022/core-epidemiology-slides.
    1. MOH. Relatório Anual das Actividades Relacionadas ao HIV/SIDA. Relatório Anual 2021. 2022.
    1. Gostin L, Hodge J, Valentine N, Nygren-Krug H. WHO Health and Human Rights Working Paper Series No 2. The Domains of Health Responsiveness: A Human Rights Analysis. Geneva; 2003.
    1. Miller JS, Mhalu A, Chalamilla G, Siril H, Kaaya S, Tito J, et al.. Patient satisfaction with HIV/AIDS care at private clinics in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. AIDS Care. 2014;26(9):1150–4. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2014.882487 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kagashe GA, Rwebangila F. Patient satisfaction with health care services provided at HIV clinics at Amana and Muhimbili hospitals in Dar es Salaam. Afr Health Sci. 2011;11 Suppl 1:S60–6. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v11i3.70072 - DOI - PMC - PubMed