Accurate prediction equations for ventilatory thresholds in cardiometabolic disease when gas exchange analysis is unavailable: development and validation
- PMID: 38636093
- DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae149
Accurate prediction equations for ventilatory thresholds in cardiometabolic disease when gas exchange analysis is unavailable: development and validation
Abstract
Aims: To develop and validate equations predicting heart rate (HR) at the first and second ventilatory thresholds (VTs) and an optimized range-adjusted prescription for patients with cardiometabolic disease (CMD). To compare their performance against guideline-based exercise intensity domains.
Methods and results: Cross-sectional study involving 2868 CMD patients from nine countries. HR predictive equations for first and second VTs (VT1, VT2) were developed using multivariate linear regression with 975 cycle-ergometer cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET). 'Adjusted' percentages of peak HR (%HRpeak) and HR reserve (%HRR) were derived from this group. External validation with 1893 CPET (cycle-ergometer or treadmill) assessed accuracy, agreement, and reliability against guideline-based %HRpeak and %HRR prescriptions using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), Bland-Altman analyses, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). HR predictive equations (R²: 0.77 VT1, 0.88 VT2) and adjusted %HRR (VT1: 42%, VT2: 77%) were developed. External validation demonstrated superiority over widely used guideline-directed intensity domains for %HRpeak and %HRR. The new methods showed consistent performance across both VTs with lower MAPE (VT1: 7.1%, VT2: 5.0%), 'good' ICC for VT1 (0.81, 0.82) and 'excellent' for VT2 (0.93). Guideline-based exercise intensity domains had higher MAPE (VT1: 6.8-21.3%, VT2: 5.1-16.7%), 'poor' to 'good' ICC for VT1, and 'poor' to 'excellent' for VT2, indicating inconsistencies related to specific VTs across guidelines.
Conclusion: Developed and validated HR predictive equations and the optimized %HRR for CMD patients for determining VT1 and VT2 outperformed the guideline-based exercise intensity domains and showed ergometer interchangeability. They offer a superior alternative for prescribing moderate intensity exercise when CPET is unavailable.
Keywords: Cardiac rehabilitation; Cardiovascular diseases; Exercise; Exercise test; Exercise therapy; Health planning guidelines; Metabolic diseases; Validation study.
Plain language summary
Equations to predict heart rate at ventilatory thresholds were developed and externally validated, offering a new perspective when a cardiopulmonary exercise test is unavailable to accurately determine the aerobic exercise intensity domains. Additionally, an adjusted range for exercise intensity prescription based on the percentage of heart rate reserve (%HRR) was provided, utilizing a large sample from eight countries.The proposed equations and the range-adjusted %HRR significantly outperformed the guideline-directed methods for determining exercise intensity, exhibiting higher accuracy, agreement, and reliability. Exercise intensity prescription based on the percentage of heart rate peak showed higher errors, raising concerns about its clinical applicability.Our study may enhance the efficacy of exercise training and physical activity advice when gas exchange analysis is unavailable, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes, even in low-resource settings. Employing these approaches in research could facilitate more tailored and consistent interventions, introducing a contemporary perspective for studies comparing exercise intensity prescriptions.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: No potential conflict of interest is reported by the authors.
Comment in
-
Exercise prescription in patients with cardiometabolic disease: new strategies when cardiopulmonary exercise test is unavailable.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Nov 18;31(16):1925-1926. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae202. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38864464 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Exercise intensity domains determined by heart rate at the ventilatory thresholds in patients with cardiovascular disease: new insights and comparisons to cardiovascular rehabilitation prescription recommendations.BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023 Jul 31;9(3):e001601. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001601. eCollection 2023. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023. PMID: 37533593 Free PMC article.
-
Exercise training intensity determination in cardiovascular rehabilitation: Should the guidelines be reconsidered?Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Dec;26(18):1921-1928. doi: 10.1177/2047487319859450. Epub 2019 Jun 20. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31219704
-
Programming exercise intensity in patients on beta-blocker treatment: the importance of choosing an appropriate method.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Dec;21(12):1474-80. doi: 10.1177/2047487313500214. Epub 2013 Aug 5. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 23918838
-
Relative Proximity of Critical Power and Metabolic/Ventilatory Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2020 Oct;50(10):1771-1783. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01314-8. Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 32613479
-
Agreement Between Heart Rate Variability - Derived vs. Ventilatory and Lactate Thresholds: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses.Sports Med Open. 2024 Oct 8;10(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00768-8. Sports Med Open. 2024. PMID: 39379776 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Exercise heart rates determined by a ventilatory threshold vs. standardized equation methods in individuals with metabolic syndrome.Sci Rep. 2025 May 27;15(1):18510. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03084-7. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40425669 Free PMC article.
-
Exercise intensity prescription in cardiovascular rehabilitation: bridging the gap between best evidence and clinical practice.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 27;11:1380639. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1380639. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39257844 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advancing Aerobic Exercise Training Intensity Prescription in Health and Disease Beyond Standard Recommendations: A Call to Action.Sports Med. 2025 Jul 4. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02272-9. Online ahead of print. Sports Med. 2025. PMID: 40613962 Review.