Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 May;30(5):1363-1372.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02955-2. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

An Omicron-specific, self-amplifying mRNA booster vaccine for COVID-19: a phase 2/3 randomized trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

An Omicron-specific, self-amplifying mRNA booster vaccine for COVID-19: a phase 2/3 randomized trial

Amit Saraf et al. Nat Med. 2024 May.

Abstract

Here we conducted a multicenter open-label, randomized phase 2 and 3 study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron-specific (BA.1/B.1.1.529), monovalent, thermostable, self-amplifying mRNA vaccine, GEMCOVAC-OM, when administered intradermally as a booster in healthy adults who had received two doses of BBV152 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. GEMCOVAC-OM was well tolerated with no related serious adverse events in both phase 2 and phase 3. In phase 2, the safety and immunogenicity of GEMCOVAC-OM was compared with our prototype mRNA vaccine GEMCOVAC-19 (D614G variant-specific) in 140 participants. At day 29 after vaccination, there was a significant rise in anti-spike (BA.1) IgG antibodies with GEMCOVAC-OM (P < 0.0001) and GEMCOVAC-19 (P < 0.0001). However, the IgG titers (primary endpoint) and seroconversion were higher with GEMCOVAC-OM (P < 0.0001). In phase 3, GEMCOVAC-OM was compared with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in 3,140 participants (safety cohort), which included an immunogenicity cohort of 420 participants. At day 29, neutralizing antibody titers against the BA.1 variant of SARS-CoV-2 were significantly higher than baseline in the GEMCOVAC-OM arm (P < 0.0001), but not in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 arm (P = 0.1490). GEMCOVAC-OM was noninferior (primary endpoint) and superior to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in terms of neutralizing antibody titers and seroconversion rate (lower bound 95% confidence interval of least square geometric mean ratio >1 and difference in seroconversion >0% for superiority). At day 29, anti-spike IgG antibodies and seroconversion (secondary endpoints) were significantly higher with GEMCOVAC-OM (P < 0.0001). These results demonstrate that GEMCOVAC-OM is safe and boosts immune responses against the B.1.1.529 variant. Clinical Trial Registry India identifier: CTRI/2022/10/046475 .

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Saraf, R.G., S.K., A. Kulkarni, D.K., A. Singh, A.R., P.A., L.S. and S.S. are employees of Gennova Biopharmaceuticals Limited. J.K., A.Y. and E.B. are employees of JSS Medical Research, the CRO hired by Gennova Biopharmaceuticals Limited for conducting this study. R.K. and RV are employees of IRSHA whose services were utilized by Gennova Biopharmaceuticals Limited for PRNT analysis. The GEMCOVAC-OM Study Investigators H.P., P.S., R.B.S., V.V., A. Karmalkar, B.D., K.G., S.D., A.B., M.S.S., S.B., V.R.T., A.V.R., D.S., M.K.J., P.B., P.D.S., M.K.D., M.L. and V.B. were clinical trial site investigators who were funded by Gennova Biopharmaceuticals Limited for their contribution to this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Humoral immune responses against Omicron B.1.1.529 variant.
a,b, Humoral immune response with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 133) and GEMCOVAC-OM (n = 271) assessed by PRNT50 (a) and anti-spike IgG antibodies (b). The data are presented as geometric mean with 95% CI. LSGMR with 95% CI at day 29 and day 90 along with the P value was calculated using ANCOVA with baseline values as covariates. Change in titers from baseline to day 29 and day 90 was calculated by using a two-sided paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test based on normality. NS, not significant.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Cellular immune responses against Omicron B.1.1.529 variant.
af, For T cell response analysis, PBMCs from ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 35) and GEMCOVAC-OM (n = 71) cohorts were stimulated with Omicron spike-specific PepTivator. Change in CD4+ T cells expressing IFNγ (a), TNF (b) and IL-2 (c) and CD8+ T cells expressing IFNγ (d), TNF (e) and IL-2 (f). g, Omicron B.1.1.529 spike+ CD19+ CD20+ B cells in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 34) and GEMCOVAC-OM (n = 67) cohorts. The data are presented as median with interquartile range. Change in cytokine expression from baseline to day 29 and day 90 was assessed using a two-sided paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test based on normality. Expression at day 29 and day 90 in both the groups was compared using a two-sided t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test based on normality. h,i, Spearman correlation between humoral and cellular responses in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (h) and GEMCOVAC-OM (i) cohorts measured at day 29. In corrplot, the blue boxes represent positive correlations and the red boxes represents negative correlation. Significant correlations were represented as an asterisk in the boxes. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Solicited local and systemic AEs.
a,b, Percentage of participants in whom local (a) and systemic (b) solicited AEs were observed in the first 7 days after a booster dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 133) and GEMCOVAC-OM (n = 2,990).
Extended Data Fig. 1
Extended Data Fig. 1. Lymphocytes populations in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and GEMCOVAC-OM cohorts.
(A) Total T-cells (CD3+ cells) population in % of lymphocyte gate applied, (B) total CD4+ T-cells population in % of total CD3+ T-cells, (C) total CD8+ T-cells in % of total CD3+ T-cells in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 35) and GEMCOVAC-OM (n = 71) cohorts. (D) Total CD19+ CD20+ B-cells in % of CD3 gated population in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 34) and GEMCOVAC-OM (n = 67) cohorts. Box plots represent the median, 25th and 75th percentiles. Whiskers extend from the minimum to maximum values in the data set. Change in T-cells from baseline to day 29 and day 90 was assessed using a two-sided paired t-test or Wilcoxon sign ranked test based on normality. Expression at day 29 and day 90 in both the groups was compared using a two-sided t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test based on normality.
Extended Data Fig. 2
Extended Data Fig. 2. Th2 response in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and GEMCOVAC-OM cohorts.
PBMCs were stimulated with Omicron Spike-specific PepTivator®. (A) IL-4 expressing CD4+ T-cells, (B) IL-13 expressing CD4+ T-cells, (C) IL-4 expressing CD8+ T-cells and (D) IL-13 expressing CD8+ T-cells in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 35) and GEMCOVAC-OM (n = 71) cohorts. Data is presented as median with interquartile range (IQR). Change in cytokine expression from baseline to day 29 and day 90 was assessed using a two-sided paired t-test or Wilcoxon sign ranked test based on normality. Expression at day 29 and day 90 in both the groups was compared using a two-sided t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test based on normality. ns = not significant.
Extended Data Fig. 3
Extended Data Fig. 3. Gating strategy used to measure Omicron B.1.1.529.
(A) Spike-specific effector T-cell responses and (B) B-cell population.

References

    1. World Health Organization. COVID-19 dashboard; https://covid19.who.int (2024).
    1. Tregoning JS, Flight KE, Higham SL, Wang Z, Pierce BF. Progress of the COVID-19 vaccine effort: viruses, vaccines and variants versus efficacy, effectiveness and escape. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021;21:626–636. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00592-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gote V, et al. A comprehensive review of mRNA vaccines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:2700. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032700. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Planas D, et al. Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron to antibody neutralization. Nature. 2022;602:671–675. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04389-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wadapurkar R, Singh S, Singh A. Leveraging the immunoinformatics approach for designing the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-specific antigenic cassette of mRNA vaccine. Vaccine. 2024;42:1630–1647. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.087. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Supplementary concepts