Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 18;17(4):729-735.
doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.04.18. eCollection 2024.

Effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes: a Meta-analysis

Yi-Heng Wang  1   2 , Qian Xu  1 , Jie Luan  1
Affiliations

Effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes: a Meta-analysis

Yi-Heng Wang et al. Int J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for diabetic macular edema (DME) in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes.

Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, EBSCO were comprehensively searched for studies comparing vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes with DME. Clinical outcomes of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), the mean number of intravitreal injection and adverse events were extracted and analyzed.

Results: Six studies involving 641 eyes were included. Final visual gain significantly improved and CMT significantly reduced in vitrectomized eyes at 6mo and 12mo visits (P<0.05). Although the mean reduction in CMT among non-vitrectomized eyes was significantly greater than in vitrectomized eyes at the 6mo [mean difference (MD)=53.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 28.03 to 78.72, P<0.0001] and 12mo (MD=49.65, 95%CI: 19.58 to 79.72, P=0.01), no significant difference was detected in improvement in BCVA at either 6mo (MD=0.05, 95%CI: -0.02 to 0.13, P=0.14) or 12mo (MD=0.03, 95%CI: -0.04 to 0.09, P=0.43). Injection number of ranibizumab in non-vitrectomized eyes was significantly less than that in vitrectomized eyes during 6-month period (MD=0.60, 95%CI: 0.16 to 1.04, P=0.008), while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups during 12mo of follow-up.

Conclusion: Evidence from current study suggests that IVR was useful for both vitrectomized group and non-vitrectomized group with DME. Although less reduction in macular thickness is found in vitrectomized group, visual improvement between two groups is similar.

Keywords: diabetic macular edema; ranibizumab; vitrectomized eye.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Wang YH, None; Xu Q, None; Luan J, None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of database search and study identification.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest plot
A: Forest plot comparing mean BCVA after IVR at 6 and 12mo follow-up (vitrectomized group vs non-vitrectomized group); B: Forest plot comparing the mean improvement in BCVA after IVR at 6 and 12mo follow-up (vitrectomized group vs non-vitrectomized group); C: Forest plot comparing mean CMT after IVR at 6 and 12mo follow-up (vitrectomized group vs non-vitrectomized group); D: Forest plot comparing the mean reduction in CMT after IVR at 6 and 12mo follow-up (vitrectomized group vs non-vitrectomized group); E: Forest plot comparing mean BCVA at baseline with after IVR in vitrectomized group; F: Forest plot comparing mean CMT at baseline with after IVR in vitrectomized group; G: Forest plot comparing mean number of intravitreal injection at 6mo between vitrectomized group and non-vitrectomized group; H: Forest plot comparing mean number of intravitreal injection at 6mo between vitrectomized group and non-vitrectomized group after the exclusion of Bressler et al. IVR: Intravitreal ranibizumab; BCVA: Best-corrected visual acuity; CMT: Central macular thickness.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Funnel plots for the Meta-analysis
A: Mean BCVA at 6 and 12mo; B: Mean improvement in BCVA at 6 and 12mo. BCVA: Best-corrected visual acuity.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Guo HX, Li WB, Nie ZT, Zhang X, Jiao MF, Bai SQ, Duan NX, Li XR, Hu BJ. Microinvasive pars Plana vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling versus anti-VEGF intravitreal injection for treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema (VVV-DME study):study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023;24(1):685. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(3):556–564. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, et al. Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and projection of burden through 2045:systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(11):1580–1591. - PubMed
    1. Taloni A, Coco G, Rastelli D, Buffon G, Scorcia V, Giannaccare G. Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant given either first-line or second-line in diabetic macular edema. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023;17:3307–3329. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitchell P, Bandello F, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lang GE, Massin P, Schlingemann RO, Sutter F, Simader C, Burian G, Gerstner O, Weichselberger A, RESTORE study group The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4):615–625. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources