Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 19;16(3):e56443.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.56443. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Current Utility of Transgastric Percutaneous Drainage for the Management of Pancreatitis-Related Retrogastric Walled-Off Necrotic Collections: A Prospective Observational Study

Affiliations

Current Utility of Transgastric Percutaneous Drainage for the Management of Pancreatitis-Related Retrogastric Walled-Off Necrotic Collections: A Prospective Observational Study

Sarthak Agrawal et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction Pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) is one of the most frequent complications associated with acute pancreatitis. The route of drainage is guided by the size and site of collection. The present study aims to assess the clinical and technical success of transgastric percutaneous drainage (PCD) for managing retrogastric walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Materials and methods A total of 44 patients with acute pancreatitis diagnosed with WOPN who underwent transgastric PCD with ultrasound or CT guidance as part of standard clinical management were included in the study. Patients were observed for improvement in clinical parameters, and treatment outcomes were noted in terms of technical success, clinical success, adverse events, need for additional procedures, hospital stay, and duration of placement of all drains. Data for the internalization of transgastric PCD was also observed in the study. Results Technical success during the drain placement was observed in 93% (n=41) of patients.Internalization of the transgastric drain was attempted in 12 patients and successful in 11 (91%). The median duration of hospital stay from the time of placement of the first PCD until discharge and the median duration of all PCDs placed were higher in patients where the transgastric drain was not internalized as compared to patients where the transgastric drain was internalized. Conclusion In WOPN, transgastric drain placement and successful internalization in any form help in the early resolution of peripancreatic and abdominal collections. It also reduces the time to percutaneous catheter removal, which in turn reduces the morbidity and decreases the need for additional interventions or surgery.

Keywords: acute necrotizing pancreatitis; internalization; percutaneous drainage; transgastric drainage; walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Steps of CT-guided transgastric drain placement
(a) An ill-defined, walled-off pancreatic necrosis in the lesser sac. (b) Placement of an 18-G needle across the anterior wall of the stomach. (c) Puncturing both the anterior and posterior walls of the stomach. (d) Passage of 0.038-inch stiff wire through the needle. (e) Dilatation of the tract using 10 Fr Coon’s dilator (f) Placement of 10 Fr locking loop pigtail catheter
Figure 2
Figure 2. Steps of internalization of transgastric drain
The stomach is inflated with air before the procedure. (a) Terumo guidewire was inserted through the drain into the collection. (b) One end of the drain and its two wires are cut, while the Terumo guidewire is still in place and the cut end is removed. (c) One end of Coon’s dilator is cut. (d) The cut end of Coon’s dilator is used to push the drain inside the stomach. (e and f) CT images showing the final position of the internalized drain within the stomach after the removal of the guidewire and dilator

References

    1. The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment. Thoeni RF. Radiology. 2012;262:751–764. - PubMed
    1. Management of pancreatic fluid collections in patients with acute pancreatitis. Mahapatra SJ, Garg PK. J Pancreatol. 2019;2:82–90.
    1. Changing role of surgery in necrotizing pancreatitis: a single-center experience. Wittau M, Scheele J, Gölz I, Henne-Bruns D, Isenmann R. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21410076/ Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;1:1300–1304. - PubMed
    1. Debridement and closed packing for sterile or infected necrotizing pancreatitis: insights into indications and outcomes in 167 patients. Rodriguez JR, Razo AO, Targarona J, Thayer SP, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Fernández-del Castillo C. Ann Surg. 2008;247:294–299. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minimal access retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy: improvement in morbidity and mortality with a less invasive approach. Raraty MG, Halloran CM, Dodd S, et al. Ann Surg. 2010;251:787–793. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources